Property Two Flashcards

(39 cards)

1
Q

Servitudes

A

A right or an obligation that “runs with the land”, i.e., binds subsequent owners or possessors of the land.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Affirmative servitudes:

A

the right to use another’s land for a limited purpose: EASEMENTS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

Negative servitudes:

A

restrictions on what owners can do with their own land: COVENANTS

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Easements:

A

A non-possessory right to use another’s land; an interest in another’s land to use it for a limited purpose. (Designated to a specific person or the land itself)
-vs. a lease (a possessory right to use a defined space for a specified time period)
-vs. a license (a limited right to enter or use the land of another)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Issues for Easement

A

A. Creation
B. Succession
C. Interpretation
D. Restrictions/Definitions (Scope)
1. Obligations
2. Limitations
3. Duration
4. Location/Relocation
E. Termination

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Express Easements:

A

As an interest in land, the Statute of Frauds requires easements to be in writing to be enforceable

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Statue of frauds requirements for an Express easement to be valid (elements)

A
  1. A writing
  2. Sufficiently identifying the grantee and grantor
  3. Signed by the grantor and grantee
  4. Sufficiently describing the easement, i.e., describing the affected land
    5.Containing words of intent to create an easement and not a lease or not to transfer title to a fee interest!
    [Including a statement of use]
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Elements for Easements to Run Burden (serviant Estate) WIN

A

1.The original easement is in writing.
2. The holder of the servient estate had notice of the easement at the time of purchase. Notice can be actual, inquiry, or constructive.
3.The original parties to the easement intended for the easement to run with the estate.

  1. Writing
  2. Notice (Three types)
  3. Intent
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Writing

A

The original easement is in writing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Notice

A

The holder of the servient estate must have notice of the easement at the time of purchase. On the benefited side there is no requirement of notice. Notice can be actual, inquiry, or constructive. If they didnt have proper notice the easement is void.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Actual notice

A

you have actual knowledge; someone says something to you or you read it.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Inquiry notice

A

visible signs or something factually puts you on notice that there is an easement. i.e telephone post, path in the middle of the land you are about to purchase, utilities/cable readers on your land)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Constructive notice

A

(if that easement deed was properly recorded, you are on constructive notice of that easement. If does not require you to go down and read the deed, just the fact that it was properly recorded meets the constructive.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Express easement to run with the estate (Intent):

A

The original parties to the easement intended for the easement to run with the estate

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Express easements can be created by grant or by reservation:

A

By grant: An easement can be created by deed that conveys the easement by itself.

By reservation: An easement can be created at the same time a parcel of property is sold. An owner of land conveys land, then “reserves” an easement in the land just conveyed.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

An express easement will run with the benefitted (dominant) estate if: WI

A

The original easement is in writing.
*The original parties to the easement intended for the subsequent owners of the dominant estate to benefit.

17
Q

Easement in gross
Easement appurtenant

A
  1. Does the burden run with the servient estate?
  2. Does the benefit run with the dominant estate?
    *If the benefit runs with a particular parcel of land, the easement is appurtenant to land. Whoever owns the land has the right to use the easement.
    *If the benefit attaches to a person or entity, the easement is in gross
18
Q

easement appurtenant

A

If the benefit runs with a particular parcel of land, the easement is appurtenant to the land. A dominate estate and a serviant estate are in existence. Whoever owns the estate, has the right to use the easement.

19
Q

easement is in gross

A

is when the benefit attaches to a person or entity. Only a serviant estate exist.

20
Q

Creation and Validity of Express Easements

A

Strict adherence to the Statute of Frauds is the practitioner’s primary defense against future title disputes. Because an easement constitutes a legitimate interest in land, the original instrument serves as the “ground truth” for all subsequent enforcement actions. To ensure a valid express easement, five essential elements must be present:

21
Q

“Greater Burden” rule

A

the servient owner (e.g., Clara or the Lupos) may impose Reasonable Restraints to prevent the dominant owner’s use from exceeding the original contemplation of the grantor. those restraints must not Unreasonably Interfere with the dominant owner’s core right of ingress and egress

22
Q

Resolving Ambiguities: Appurtenant vs. In Gross (“Presumption of Appurtenance)

A

Courts maintain a strong judicial preference for land-based interests (Appurtenant) over personal interests (In Gross) to ensure the predictable utility of neighboring tracts. This “Presumption of Appurtenance” is applied whenever an easement is ambiguous but involves two parcels of land.

23
Q

Servient vs. Dominant Parcels

A

The servient parcel (or burdened estate) is the land that contains the easement and must allow the other party to enter. The dominant parcel (or benefited estate) is the land that holds the right to use the easement across the servient parcel.

24
Q

Elements for Burden to Run:

A

For the burden of an easement to bind a successor of the servient estate, the original agreement must have been in writing, the successor must have had notice of the easement at the time of purchase, and the original parties must have intended for the easement to run with the land

25
define the concept of scope relative to an easement holder rights
The extent of allowed use, locations, restricitions, and obligations associated with the easement.
26
When there is no clear evidence of purpose of the easement?
Absent clear evidence of the parties’ intent, most courts will find that the manner of use of an easement may “change over time to take advantage of developments in technology and to accommodate normal development of the dominant estate or enterprise benefited by the servitude,” so long as it does not unreasonably burden the servient estate.
27
Scope questions to ask
(a) whether the use is of a kind encompassed by the easement, (b) whether the use is so heavy that it constitutes an unreasonable burden on the servient estate, and (c) whether the easement can be subdivided among multiple users.
28
The Rule of Succession and Subdivision (Dominate Estate)
Each subsquent owner of the subdivided portion of the dominant estate succeeds to the right to use the easement.
29
The Easement Holder (Dominant Estate): scope and extent of use
◦ Has the right to use the easement for the stated purpose (e.g., ingress and egress). ◦ Has the right and the duty to maintain, repair, and improve the easement (e.g., shoveling snow or removing fallen trees). May take advantage of technological developments (e.g., using an SUV on a path originally intended for horse and buggy) so long as it does not create an undue burden. ◦ May not place an unreasonable burden on the servient estate.
30
Servient holder : scope
The duty to refraim from interfering with the easement holders authorized use of land. The serviant owner has the right to use the land for any purpose that does not interfere with the easement holders right.
31
undue burden rule for sub division of dominate estate
while successors to subdivided parcles may use the easement, the collective use must not exceed the reasonable burden contemplated at creation.
32
Purpose test to see if a new easment use is permissable.
The new use must be reasonably included within the orginal purpose stated in the granting instrument.
33
The Default Rule: No Unilateral Relocation
Under general property law, the owner of the servient estate (the land crossed by the easement) cannot unilaterally relocate the easement. Even if moving the road would make the property better or more convenient, the location is fixed once established. To move it, they typically need the permission of the easement holder (the dominant estate)
34
The Exception in Cox v. Glenbrook
The grantor (serviant Estate) must bear the total expense of the relocation
35
Circumstantial Evidence: The "Nature" of the Easement
When the deed lacks clear "heirs and assigns" language, courts look at the nature of the use to infer intent. * Ingress and Egress: The lecture highlights that easements for "ingress and egress" (entering and exiting) are strong evidence of an intent to run with the land. Why? Because the ability to enter and exit a property is useful to anyone who lives there, not just the specific individual named in the deed. * Usefulness to the Land: The court looks at whether the easement is useful separate from land ownership. If the right (like a driveway) is only valuable because you own the adjacent land, the court infers it was intended to benefit the land itself, not just the person
36
Easement by estoppel
Easement by Estoppel is an equitable remedy that prevents a landowner from revoking a license when a user has significantly relied on it. This doctrine transforms a revocable license into a permanent property interest to prevent "Injustice."
37
Easement by estoppel Three Categories: N, R, D
1. Non compliance with Statue of Frauds 2. Reasonable reliance on the continuation of consent 3. Fraud or misrepresentation
38
Easement by Estoppel elements
Permission (License): The landowner granted permission. Foreseeable Reliance: The owner could foresee the user would rely on that permission. Changed Position: The user invested resources or took action (e.g., building a structure) based on that reliance. Prevention of Injustice: Revocation would be unconscionable.
39