Risk premium defn:
Expected cost of claims during period for which premiums will apply
o May or may not include allocated loss adjustment expenses (ALAE) or unallocated loss adj. exp. (ULAE)
Office premium defn
Office premium = Risk premium + various loadings
Various loadings include:
Main properties of burning cost approach:
Data requirements for RUBCA (rating using burning cost approach):
Considerations when RUBCA is employed:
RUBCA uses historical claims experience for pricing BUT:
Burning cost premium defn:
Cost of claims INCURRED in the past per unit of exposure
What are the alternative formulae for burning cost premium? (hint: Fundamental terms of derivation)
-> (Total claims) / (Total exposure)
* Exposure defined as the product of sum insured and time for which policyholder is exposed to risk (eg. no of years)
-> (Total claims)/(no. of claims) x (no. of claims)/(total exp.)
= avg. claims x avg. frequency of claims
Note: Used when the measure of exposure = policy year
-> (Total claims)/(no. of claims) x (no. of claims)/(total exp.)
= (Total claims)/(no. of claims) x
(no. of policies)/(total exp) x
(no. of claims)/(no. of policies)
= (Total claims)/(no. of claims) -: (total exp)/(no. of policies)
x (no. of claims)/(no. of policies)
= (average claims)/(avg. exp. per policy) x
(avg claim per policy)
—————————————————————————————-Fundamental terms for derivation
- Total claims
- Total exposure
- No. of claims
- No. of policies
What does trending and development of losses concern?
What are possible trends we allow for in claims & exposure data?
** these adjustments will be challenging considering with RUBCA we have aggregate claims (not well detailed data). Might have to make assumptions
Developing losses under RUBCA
How to project past exposure to future projection period?
Considerations
These considerations depend on:
How to project past claims to future projection period?
Advantages & disadvantages of RUBCA:
Advantages:
Disadvantages:
When is it suitable to use RUBCA?