LOS 33a: Distinguish between financial reporting quality and quality of reported results (including quality of earnings, cash flow, and balance sheet items)
Financial reporting quality refers to the usefulness of information contained in the financial reports, including disclosures in notes
Earnings quality ( or quality of reported results) Pertains to earnings and cash generated by the company’s core economic activities and its resulting financial condition.
These two attributes are interrelated because earnings quality cannot be evaluated until there is some assurance regarding the quality of financial reporting. If financial reporting quality is low, the information provided is not useful in evaluating company performance or to make investment decisions
LOS 33b: Describe a spectrum for assessing financial reporting quality
LOS 33c: Distinguish between conservative and aggressive accounting
The Quality Spectrum is described below, starting with the highest quality
GAAP, Decision-useful, Sustainable, and Adequate Returns
These are high quality reports that provide useful information about high-quality earnings
High quality financial reports:
High quality earnings indicate an adequate return on investments. Further, earnings must be derived from activities that the company will likely be able to sustain in the future. Sustainable earnings that provide a high return on investment increase company value
GAAP, Decision - Useful, but Sustainable?
This level refers to a situation where high-quality reporting provides useful information, but the information reflected earnings that are not sustainable. earnings may be unsustainable because:
Within GAAP, but biased accounting choices
Biased choices result in financial reports that do not faithfully represent the company’s true economic situation
Poor reporting quality often comes with poor earnings quality, as aggressive accounting assumptions may be employed to obscure poor performance. However it is also possible for poor reporting quality to come with high-quality earnings if:
Within GAAP, but “Earnings Management”
Earnings management can be define as “making intentional choices or taking deliberate action to influence reported earnings and their interpretation. There are 2 ways earnings can be managed:
Departures from GAAP- Noncompliant Accounting
Financial info that deviates from GAAP is obviously low quality. Further such financial information cannot be used to assess earnings quality, as comparisons with other entities or earlier periods cannot be made
Departures from GAAP - Fictitious Transactions
There have been instances of companies using fictitious transactions to 1) fraudulently obtain investments by inflating company performance or 2) obscure fraudulent misappropriation of company assets
Differentiate between Conservative and Aggressive Accounting
When it comes to financail reporting, the ideal situation would be if financial reporting were ubiased. It may seem like investors would favor conservative accounting and managers would favor aggressive, however when it comes to establishing expectation of the future, neutral accounting works best.
Conservatism in Accounting standards
While neutrality is supported, there are some conservatively biased standards. An example is how recognition of revenues generally requires a higher level of verification than recognition of expenses. Other examples of conservatism in accounting standards inclue research costs, litigation costs, insurance recoverables, and commodity invetories
Benefits of Conservatism
Bias in the Application of Accounting Standards
In order to characterize the application of an accounting standard as conservative or aggressive, we must look at intent. Examples of biased accounting disguised as conservatism include:
LOS 33d: Describe motivations that might cause management to issue financial reports that are not high quality
Motivations
LOS 33e: Describe conditions that are conductive to issuing low-quality, or even fraudulent, financial reports
These 3 conditions exist:
LOS 33f: Describe mechanisms that discipline financial reporting quality and the potential limitations of those mechanisms
Markets: Companies compete for capital and the cost of capital is directly related to the level of perceived risk. In the absence of any other conflicting incentives, companies should aim to provide high-quality financial reports to minimize their long-term cost of capital
Regulatory Authorities market regulators establish and enforce rules. They directly affect financial reporting quality through:
Auditors
while Public companies are required to have their financial statements audited by an independent auditor, private companies also obtain audit opinions
Limitations of Audit opinions:
Private Contracting
Parties that have a contractual agreement with a company have an inventive to monitor the company’s performance and to ensure that financial reports are of high quality. Consider the following provisions:
LOS 33g: Describe presentation choices, including non GAAP measures that could be used to influence an anlaysts opinion.
Presentation Choices
During the Tech Boom, companies earnings couldn’t justify their extremely high stock price, so market participants tried to justify these valuations with metrics as “eyeballs captures” or the “stickiness” of websites.
Companies have also used “pro forma earnings”, where they remove certain restructuring charges to show they have good operating performance
Before 2001 there were 2 methods for acquisitions
The companies that had to use the purchase method felt at a disadvantage, so to make up for it they stopped reporting amortizing charges all together
EBITDA has been widely used because it is the earnings before certain accounting policies can manipulate them. Companies are now finding a way to manipulate EBITA by excluding items such as:
LOS 33h: Describe accounting methods (choices and estimates) that could be used to manage earnings, cash flow, and balance sheet items
Revenue Recognition
Depreciation Policies Regarding Long-Lived Assets
Capitalization Policies Relating to Intangibles
Inventory Cost Methods
In a period of rising prices and stable or increasing inventory quantities:
Deferred Tax Assets and Valuation Accounts
Company’s can carry losses forward to reduce their taxes payable. In order to recognize these deferred tax assets, there must be an expectation that the company will generate enough taxable income in the future. Otherwise the value of these tax assets must be reduced through a contra asset account known as the valuation allowance
Warranty Reserves
Analysts should examine whether these reserves have been manipulated to meet earnings targets. Further the trend in actual costs relative to amounts allocated to reserves should be assessed, as it can offer insight into the quality of products sold
Related Party Transactions
If the company engages in extensive dealings with nonpublic companies under management control, the nonpublic companies could be used to absorb losses in order to improve the public company’s reported performance
Choices that affect the cash flow statement
Many investory scutinize the operating section of the cash flow statement in detail, as they believe that operating cash flow serves as a reality check on earnings; significant earnings that can be attributed to accrual accounting and are unsupported by actual cash generation may indicate earnings manipulation. The operating section can still be managed in the following ways:
LOS 33i: Describe accounting warning signs and methods for detecting manipulation of information in financial reports
Warning Signs related to Revenue
Analysts should:
Warning Signs Related to Inventories
Analysts should:
Warning Signs related to Capitalization Policies and Deferred Costs
Analysts should examine the company’s accounting policy notes for its capitalization policy for long-term assets and for its handling of other deferred costs, and compare those policies with industry practice.
Warning Signs Related to the Relationship between Cash Flow and Income
If a company’s net income is persistently higher than cash provided by operations, it raises the possibility that aggressive accrual accounting policies have been used to shift current expenses to later periods. Analysts may construct a time series of cash generated by operations divided by net income. If the ratio is consistently below 1.0, or has declined consistently, there may be a problem in the company’s accrual accounts
Other Potential Warning Signs