capitalism - the concept
capitalism - the history of the concept
capital/capitalism (in historical order)
!!Marx rarely used ‘‘capitalism’’, rather he used ‘‘capitalist mode of production’’
Karl Rodbertus asserted ‘‘capitalism has become a social system”
(1870 definition capitalism Albert Schaffle)
*he advocated state-sponsored reforms in order to mitigate the conflict between wage labor and capital
capitalism =
national and international ‘‘organism’’ of production under the leadership of ‘‘entrepreneurial’’ capitalists competing for the highest profits
characteristics of the concept of capitalism as it emerged in the period leading up to WW1
dual function of the term capitalism
this dual function makes it suspicious to some: both functions can but don’t need to stand in each other’s way
capitalism until around 1500
primarily merchant capitalism
-> impact on econ. + soc. overall rather limited
expansion of capitalism early modern era
since 1500 the concept expanded spatially into the newly established world-trading system + crossed new frontiers into the sphere of production + became important for society as a whole (esp. in England + the Netherlands
how it was evaluated by the public changed
Europe became the leading region in the history of capitalism
what was all contingent with each other?
Business and Violence: Colonialism and World Trade
Marx: capitalism came in the world soaked in blood and filth (= part true: age of discovery was age of subjugation, violent and commercial)
16th century = crown capitalism
17thcentury = merchant capitalism of the Dutch (contended with the French and English for influence in North America and Africa, England won)
gap between Western Europe and the rest of the continent became deeper + western Europe came to control 35% of the worlds’ territory
irritating amalgamation of trade and warffare, aggressive jumble of lust for power, capitlaist dynamism, lawless violence
driving forces behind European expansion
*conquistadors etc. were mostly acting independently, combining the military with the commercial
triangular trade
Europe -> AFrican West Coast = products for mass consumption (textile, metal utensils, weapons)
African West Coast -> America = slaves (=cheap labour)
America-> Europe = sugar tobacco, cotton, other American export goods
*trade relations/centers also changed within Europe: center moved more and more to the West, with exports being transported from Eastern Europe
Joint-Stock Company and Finance Capitalism
merchant capitalism + expanding colonialism -> organizational innovations
!trade enterprises had already existed 16th century, but became public/bigger
VOC
seems modern, what’s distinct is: monopoly with extensive quasi-governmental powers (States-General gave VOC right to operate all Dutch trading east of the Cape of Good Hope + authorization to wage war, conclude treaties, take posession of land, and build fortresses)
!!fit with the political needs of the era: the VOC was formed to prevent competition among Dutch traders and to compete better with other states
rise of the banks
stock market + speculation -> classes of society were introduced to hopes, gains, losses, disappointments of capital
most important arenas in which capitalism rearranged the sphere of production even prior to industrialization
capitalism as doubly free wage labor
labor free of
recruited and paid on a conctractual basis, paid within the framework of an exchange relationship of labor power against wages
!!triumph of capitalism came first with a massive increase in unfree labor!! = scarcity and insufficient suitability of native workers on plantations -> slave trade
(indentured servants)
unfree workers
2 things that should be emphasized about te plantation economy
under some conditions capitalism can work in different ways of organizing and exploiting work: e.g. homogenous staple commodities requiring unskilled work, poorly developed labor market, cultural and racial differences capitalists and workers
efficiency of the slave economy
remained limited: slaves kept their output deliberately low due to lack of motivation and latent resistance
!it is unlikely that a more diverse agriculture + business based on diversified skills + later industrialization would have been possible in the long run on the basis of slave labor
*slavery remained profitable in 19th century + its abandoning had to do with political pressure rather than due to its economic inferiority
northwestern Europe historic breakthrough to accelerated, ever-renewing, and self-driven growth
locating capitalism
around 1800, capitalism was a European phenomenon, fully expressed only in Northwestern Europe, however much it had been simultaneously facilitated and codetermined by global linkages