On another occasion, we got sent out
And one of them legs it up the road,
probably armed, possibly not.
Three of a kind all letting fly, and I swear
I see every round as it rips through his life –
I see broad daylight on the other side.
So we’ve hit this looter a dozen times
and he’s there on the ground, sort of inside out,
Dehumanised ‘looter’ ‘sort of inside out’ makes the victim appear more of an object than what was moments ago a living breathing person. Its cage, like he’s trying to disconnect himself from it.
One of my mates goes by
Colloquialism, ‘mate’ almost makes this appear like a night out with the lads, like a social event. He’s belittling it again in order not to feel overwhelmed by emotion.
and tosses his guts back into his body.
His blood-shadow stays on the street, and out on patrol
Metaphor for the memory of the man and events. Blood connotes death, shadow connoting lingering memory.
Sleep, and he’s probably armed, and possibly not.
And the drink and the drugs won’t flush him out –
dug in behind enemy lines,
Analogy, describes the memory like a hostile soldier in his mind, where he cannot get him. It shouldn’t be there.
or six-feet-under in desert sand,
Sibilance, smothered, six, sand: gives the impression of a sinister dream/nightmare like state.
his bloody life in my bloody hands.
Explain the poems context…
The poem is written from the perspective of a soldier stationed in Iraq or Afghanistan (or any warzone really). They are on patrol and fire on some bank robbers. One of the looters appeared to possibly have a gun so they open fire. The rest of the poem is looking at the fact the solider, even long after this event, cannot leave the memory behind and carries this dead man with him in
his mind.
Post traumatic stress and mental illness is very common in soldiers who struggle to come to terms with some part of their duty, normally a horrific memory of killing or being in danger which
gives them nightmares and panic attacks as well as depression and sometimes suicidal tendencies.
Simon Armitage is a famous UK poet who is known for being very direct in his work. His recent poems have looked at the experiences of war and soldiers.
Explain what the poem is about…
The poem is originally set in a warzone and naturally looks at conflict in a direct way. However it also looks heavily at the after effects of conflict and the long term effects it has on the people involved. Power is partly shown in this as well, firstly the soldiers power over life and death but later the power over their own memory and experiences. Mental health and morality are also key in this.
Explain the poems structure…
The poem is written in 8 stanzas, the last of which is a couplet which leaves the poem on a dramatic end
note. It does not rhyme and the poem is a monologue, using very conversational asides and syntax to structure the sentences into a very conversational tone “end of story, not really”. There is also a lot of enjambment and caesura used to emphasises the natural speech patterns of the speaker. Another key factor in this poem is the use of colloquialism (slang) and personal pronouns to give it a sense of realism, “One of my mates,”.
There is a loose set of rhymes in the poem, often internal and used to give an almost childish aspect to the horror of the warzone. It perhaps suggests how numb this soldier is to what is happening.
How does the word numb relate to this poem?
The speaker in the poem (the soldier) appears to be numb to the horror of the experience of war, most of the horrific images of death and killing are juxtaposed to the casual nature of the way the soldier speaks, using slang and clichés. In part this reflects a conflict in himself, the way he sees these events and how they affect him, but also his way of trying to maintain control, by trivialising the whole experience.
Key points…
Themes in the poem…
Key quotes for the poem…
"probably armed, possibly not" "tosses his guts" "rips through his life" "drink and drugs" "my bloody hands"
I walk right over it week after week.
Then I’m home on leave. But I blink