What characterises research ethics?
It’s an ongoing process
- before starting
- during data collection
- during analysis and writing
-> constant reflect
At which level (instances) should you reflect on research ethics?
What are the different ethical stances currently in scientific research?
Why was Humphrey’s Tearoom experiment (1970) controversial?
What are the principles of the Code of Ethics from the American Anthropological Association (AAA)?
What is the implication behind the existence of multiple codes of ethics by diverse ethics committees (e.g., AAA, EASA, ABV, ASA)?
Lots of interpretation
-> need of constant reflection
When can there be harm to participants?
In what way may there be harm to the discipline of Anthropology?
What is the responsibility of anthropological researchers towards future researchers?
Maintaining relationships with communities intact for future research
How do you confirm research participants give informed consent?
Participants
- are informed
- give consent in written or verbal (recorded) form
- can withdraw
What kind of difficulties can you encounter in obtaining informed consent?
How do you confirm transparency in your research?
How can you indirectly remind people you’re a researcher throughout your field work?
Take field notes in front of them
What is the universalist view on ethics in social research?
Ethical rules should never be broken
Who is associated with universalism in the ethics of social research?
What are the arguments of situation ethics (or principled relativism)?
-> flexibility in ethical decision-making
rather than ‘anything goes’
Who is associated to situation ethics (principled relativism)?
What does deontological ethics argue?
Certain acts are right or wrong in and of themselves.
What does consequentialist ethics argue?
We should be guided by whether the consequences of an act are right or wrong.
Which type of ethics tend to prevail on ethical issues in social research?
Deontological ethical arguments (vs consequentialist)