Lab strengths and weaknesses and what is it
IV is manipulated by researcher
+ high levels of control - standardised so less chance of extraneous variables
+highly replicable
+ cause and effect relationships
+high internal validity
- lacks mundane realism - leads to demand characteristics
- lacks ecological validity
Field strength and weakness and what it is
An experiment done in the ps natural environment - eg shopping centre or town
+ high mundane realism - less demand characteristics
+ ecological validity - good external validity
- less control over extraneous variables
- can’t randomly assign ps
Naturalistic - strengths and weaknesses and what it is
The IV can’t be changed due to naturally occurred circumstances - eg a child going to hospital at 5 and 10
+external validity - low chance of DC’s
+ allows research that couldn’t happen in controlled research due to ethical issues
Types of observation - naturalistic vs controlled
Naturalistic - where behaviour would normally take place - better validity
Controlled - manipulation of IV
Some control over extraneous variables
Better reliability as findings are more consistent
Types of observation - overt vs covert
Overt - ps are aware they are being watched and give informed consent
Higher reliability but reduced validity
Covert - ps are unaware they are apart of a study - ethical issues of consent
Higher reliability and validity
Types of observation - participant and non-participant
Participant - the researcher becomes involved in the experiment
Non-participant - the researcher remains separate as it can be difficult to intergrate into a study
Types of observation - structured and unstructured
Structured -