AVERT trial
AVERT non-significant results
deaths
adverse events
falls
AVERT trial significant results
GET PATIENTS UP EARLY
time in PT
Time to first mobilization
costs of care at 3 months
modified rankin
ability to walk unassisted at 3, 6 months
Winston, Gardner, McNeal trial
examined effects if standing balance training on balance and locomotion in individuals with hemiparesis
used standing feedback trainer
Winston, Gardner, McNeal trial - standing balance outcomes
get better finding midline
lateral COP more towards midline in SFT group
Winston, Gardner, McNeal trial - locomotion outcomes
standing balance activities dod not improve gait outcomes
no significant difference in velocity, cadence, stride length, or gait cycle duration, single limb stance time
Perry et. al trial
categorized functional walking in patients with chronic stroke according to gait speed
What did Von Schroeder et. al report?
normal 64 yo were able to ambulate with a speed of 1.07 m/sec while chronic stroke survivors of similar age walked at 0.8 m/sec
Grotta JC et. al trial
CIMT of UE post CVA
Grotta JC et. al non-significant outcomes
motor activity log
Grotta JC et. al significant outcomes
fugl - Meyer
grooved pegboard test
TMS activation sites 2 weeks post intervention»_space; pts are using arm
EXCITE trial
retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received CIMT
EXCITE trial significant outcomes
wolf motor function test
motor activity log
stroke impact scale
task practice and shaping