Describe the standard ABR test for acoustic tumor detection.
What did Eggermont et al. (1980) state about the standard ABR test for acoustic tumor detection?
-“ABR yields high detection scores: up to 90% The larger the tumor, the easier its detection. It is likely that small tumors (<1 cm) will be missed.”
What are the consequences of failure to detect small tumors?
-All patients with suspicious clinical hearing and balance symptoms are sent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
What are drawbacks of MRI screening for acoustic tumor detection?
Why do standard ABR measures often fail to detect small tumors?
Why is wave V latency dominated by HF ANFs in the standard ABR?
What is the rationale behind the stacked ABR?
What stimuli are used in the stacked ABR?
What do derive-band ABRs result in?
What is the Stacking Technique?
How can physiological noise be minimized in the ABR?
What is Bayesian weighting?
-Those blocks of sweeps that have the lowest physiological noise are given the greatest weight in the average
Compare specificity between the standard and stacked ABR.
STANDARD ABR (IT5 and I-V Delay)
STACKED ABR
-Specificity: 83%
What is the stacked ABR better at doing better than the standard ABR?