Corcoran v Anderton
There must be completed theft for robbery
R v Waters
No intention to permanently deprive, no robbery
R v Dawson and James
Force can be indirect for there to be a robbery
B and R v DPP
No need to to show victim felt threatened, threat of force can be implied
R v Hale
Theft can be a continuing act
R v Lockley
Theft still ongoing as he hasn’t left the shop