Robbery Flashcards

(21 cards)

1
Q

ROBBERY

A

Section 234(1), Crimes Act 1961

  • Theft
  • Accompanied by violence or accompanied by threats of violence
  • To any person or property
  • Used to extort the property stolen, or to prevent or overcome resistance to its being stolen
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

AGGRAVATED ROBBERY (a)

A

Section 235(a), Crimes Act 1961

  • Robs any person
  • At the time of, or immediately before or immediately after, the robbery, causes grievous bodily harm
  • To any person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

AGGRAVATED ROBBERY (b)

A

Section 235(b), Crimes Act 1961

  • Being together with any other person or persons,
  • Robs
  • Any person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

AGGRAVATED ROBBERY (c)

A

Section 235(c), Crimes Act 1961

  • Being armed with any offensive weapon or instrument, or any thing appearing to be such a weapon or instrument
  • Robs
  • Any other person
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

R v Lapier

A

Robbery is complete the instant the property is taken, even if possession by the thief is only momentary.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

R v Peat

A

The immediate return of the property by the robber does not absolve the crime.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

defence to robbery

R v Skivington

A

Defence to theft (claim of right) is a defence to Robbery

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

R v Maihi

A

There must be a nexus between the act of stealing and the threat of violence. Both must be present, however, it is not required that the act of stealing and threat be made contemporaneously.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

R v Broughton

A

A threat may be direct or veiled, conveyed by conduct or words, or both. Absence of fear by the victim does not negate the threat.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

R v Joyce

A

Crown must establish at least two people physically present at the time of the robbery.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

R v Galey

A

Being together means two or more person having the common intention to use their combined force.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

R v Bentham

A

What is possessed must under the definition be a thing. A person’s hand or fingers are not a thing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Peneha v Police

A

It is sufficient that the defendants’ act’s forcibly interfere with the personal freedom of the victim.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

R v Wells

A

There is no requirement that the harm be inflicted on the victim of the robbery, it can include any other person present.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Define Without Claim of Right

A

S2 CA1961 Belief in a possessory right of the property.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Define Dishonestly

A

Without a belief that there was consent form a person with authority to give it.

17
Q

R v Mitchell

A

There may be occasions where property is handed over to a theif as a result of threats previously made that are still operating on the mind of the victim.

18
Q

Define extort

A

Obtain by coercion or intimidation

19
Q

Offensive weapon

A

Offensive weapon means any article made or altered for use for causing bodily injury, or intended by the person having it with him or her for such use.

20
Q

Define prevent

A

To stop the possibility of resistance.

21
Q

Define overcome resistance

A

To overpower or get the better of in conflict