What is the purpose of a power calculation?
It helps you choose a sample size such that if the new drug truly is substantially better, we would be fairly certain of getting a significant result
What are the two different approaches to sample size calculations?
2. Power approach
When is a precision approach used for study size calculations?
If the study aim is to obtain a prevalence estimate (or other estimate) and 95% CI
You need a rough guess of the prevalence and an idea of how precise or narrow you want the confidence interval to be
When would you need more people in your sample for a precision approach?
e.g.
Prevalence of 8% and want to estimate within 2% of truth (with 95% confidence) = need 706 people
Prevalence of 10% and want to estimate within 2% = need 864 ppl
Prevalence of 10% and want to estimate within 1% = need 3445 ppl
When is a power approach used for sample size calculations? What do you need to know?
If the study aim is to carry out a statistical test to compare two groups
You need to know:
When would you need more people in your sample for a power approach?
When you want to detect a smaller difference between the groups, want a smaller significance level, want greater power or if the population prevalence is closer to 0.5
E.g.
Prevalence 4% in women. Want to detect difference of 2% higher in men with 90% power and at 5% sig level = 2600 in each group
Same as above but with 80% power = 1960 in each group
What are some general points for study size calculations?
Does a non-significant result mean no true effect?
Not necessarily - may be that the sample size is too small
Research papers should always provide details of the power/sample size calculations in the methods section but this isn’t always the case
What are the downsides of recruiting too many or too few participants?
Too many = waste of resources
Too few = may fail to detect important effect and estimates of the effect may be too imprecise (wide CIs)