who belief that science is compatible with christianity
John Polkinghorne
what are Polkinghorne 5 arguments
purely sciatific view on universe doesn’t satisfy need to understand the very intelligibility of the world - opens to scientific inquiry science is unable to penetrate sees it as Gods plan
version of anthropic Principe - existence of life a fact of interest calling for an explanation.
demises Humes as speculation as he dismisses multiverse no evidence filed argument against there being a god
argues God creates sustains cares for human life allows purpose hicks epistemic distance
religious experience don’t require consideration - rejects Humes argument argues differences are due to cultural conditioning
NT Wright necessity of Jesus’ resurrection as a historical event
insists that religion and science are compatible as different ways of understanding reality
give facts on genetic engineering - 3
christian responses to enhancement therapy
social rather than medical purpose - creates superior human race - rejected by church
interferes with being made in image of God
two tier society those who can afford and can’t
christian responses to somatic cell therapy
therapeutic genetic engineering correct genetic disorders welcomed loving and responsible use of God given skills - as long as benefits outweigh costs
christian responses to xenotransplantation
animal diseases potentially being transmitted to human don’t like
christian responses to genetically modified crops
poorest countries suffer the most in terms of global climate change and hunger concern about reducing biodiversty unwon consequences of its use
some support
medieval times
happy relationship
God ordered universe using natural law
renaissance
period in European history - transition from Middle Ages to modernity
new thinking let to progress in art, politics science etc
enlightenment
intellectual philosophical movement dominated world of ideas. emerges out of renaissance humanism and preceded by scientific revolution
deism
popular in negligent - a diety set things of no longer involved in workings - as laws are set in place most reject - incompatible with church teachings e.g. religious experience
existentialism
humans define own meaning in life - existence entirely about choices that make them what they are
no clash between religion and science concerned with meaning and purpose of life
view faith as personal commitment
Darwin evolution
noticed how animals differed from another on different islands
different conditions = adaptions
survival of forest only strongest survived
contraversal, competitive, blind
What were the 4 main assumptions that Darwins theory challenged
19th century christian responses to Darwins theory
initial responses were defensive and dismissive evolution was seen as an affront on the Bible
Church of England ridiculed the theory
fundamentalists disagreed - bible couldn’t be wrong
some lost faith in God
liberals allowed theory
creationists
fundamentalists - once one belief undermined all collapses
scripture inspired and true
evolution - theory - may be proved wrong science can only support scripture
young earth creationism
genesis literally true 100,000 years ago
old earth creationism
accepts earth 4 million years old - allows evolution God created it
god of the gaps
doesn’t need to explain everything.. god fills in gaps as we understand more science God gave out