The 2 scientific + religious debates
Scientific methodology: miracles topic
Observation
Hypothesis
Experimentation
Complementarity vs conflict of scientific method + religion
✅ Empirical observation + a posteriori claims
✅ Goulds: non-overlapping magesterium = rel asks WHY + sci asks HOW
⛔️ Scientific focus on falsification vs. faith (objective/subjective)
⛔️ Science seeks natural explanations vs. rel look to supernatural moral meaning
Definition of Miracles
Aquinas = A miracle is an event beyond natural order caused by God.
Humes critique of miracles
Always more rational to reject a miracle claim than to accept:
Swinburnes defence of miracles
Accept if they fit within a coherent religious worldview and are supported by reliable testimony:
Strengths of belief in miracles (3)
Weaknesses of belief in miracles
🌱
Punitive parenting causes authoritarian personality = scape goat of lower status
BIG BANG theory
Developed by Hubble:
~ 14 billion yrs ago space, time + matter was created as a result of rapid expansion of a single dense point
Steady state theory of creation
Hoyle
The universe is eternal = continuous creation of matter to maintain density.
Darwins notion evolution by natural selection
Common ancestor from which beneficial traits for survival/reproduction are passed on + Survival of the Fittest
Dawkins evolution view
Selfish-gene = God Delusion
Evolution at genetic level, humans programmed for reproducing them into next gen
Intelligent Design & Fine Tuning
Behe
Life’s complexity (natural laws) suggests a designer beyond natural processes.
Gaia Hypothesis
Lovelock
Earth operates as a self-regulating organism maintaining conditions suitable for life.
Cosmological Theories complimenting religion (3)
Big Bang Theory
Fine-Tuning Argument
Theistic evolution
Cosmological Theories contradicting religion (2)
Steady State Theory + Gaia
Evolutionary Theory
Creationism
Account of Genesis is literal, reject sci exp that don’t conform (e.g. Morris)