Section 4: Examples Flashcards

(12 cards)

1
Q

What example illustrates Song’s remedial right?

A

When a person’s basic interests cannot be protected by their own state—such as in cases of persecution, severe deprivation, or systemic exclusion—migration may be necessary as a remedy rather than a mere opportunity.

Relation to mandatory authors:
This illustrates Song’s view that migration rights arise from state failure, not from a general interest in better opportunities.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What example motivates Wellman’s self-determination claim?

A

Forced annexation would be wrong even if it improved welfare, because it violates collective self-rule.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What example illustrates Kukathas’ critique of refugee specialness?

A

A person fleeing famine may face the same threat to life as someone fleeing persecution, yet only one qualifies as a refugee.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What example shows structural injustice in the refugee system?

A

Visa rules, carrier sanctions, and underfunded camps are each justified individually but together trap refugees in long-term limbo.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What example illustrates indirect racial discrimination?

A

Points-based immigration systems that favor Western education and experience systematically advantage groups shaped by colonial history.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What example illustrates cultural injustice in selection?

A

Preferring refugees who speak the host state’s language disadvantages equally vulnerable non-speakers shaped by colonial exclusion.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What example shows arbitrariness in deportation?

A

Deporting a long-term resident for minor paperwork violations despite deep social ties.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

What example captures amnesty as vindication?

A

Legalizing undocumented migrants because immigration laws were unjust, not because migrants are forgiven for wrongdoing.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What contrast helps explain indirect discrimination in immigration?

A

A policy that excludes on racial grounds explicitly versus one that excludes through “neutral” criteria like education or language but has the same racialized effects.

(Contrast: intent vs effect.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What contrastive example shows why Parekh calls the refugee crisis structural?

A

Even when no state violates refugee law and all actors follow accepted rules, refugees remain stuck in camps and dangerous conditions.

(Contrast: wrongdoing vs systemic failure.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What contrast explains why deportation is not just border control?

A

Refusing entry to someone at the border versus deporting someone who has lived, worked, and formed social ties in the state for years.

(Contrast: outsider vs social member.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What contrast illustrates amnesty as vindication rather than forgiveness?

A

Granting legal status because migrants are morally blameless versus granting it because immigration laws themselves were unjust.

(Contrast: blaming migrants vs blaming the law.)

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly