Section 9: confounding Flashcards

(47 cards)

1
Q

What is the multifactorial nature of disease?

A
  • Most diseases caused by multiple factors (not a single cause).
  • Risk factors ↑ disease risk; protective factors ↓ disease risk.
  • Factors are called disease determinants and vary by disease.
  • Many chronic diseases share common determinants like poor diet, physical inactivity, smoking, and stress.
  • Targeting these shared determinants can prevent multiple diseases.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

What are disease determinants?

A

Factors that influence the occurrence and progression of diseases, including:

  • Genetic factors
  • Biological/physiological factors
  • Lifestyle factors
  • Psychosocial factors
  • Sociodemographic factors
  • Wider environmental factors

They can vary for different diseases.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What types of diseases are particularly affected by common determinants?

A

Chronic diseases such as:

  • Cardiovascular diseases
  • Cerebrovascular diseases
  • Type 2 diabetes
  • Cancer
  • Neurodegenerative diseases
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Define confounding.

A

A variable that distorts or biases the observed relationship between an exposure and an outcome.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What are the implications of confounding?

A
  1. It can create associations
  2. It can mask associations
  3. It can overestimate or underestimate associations
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is a spurious association?

A

False/misleading relationship between 2 variables that appears to be causal but is actually caused by a third, hidden factor.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What criteria must a potential confounder meet?

A
  1. It must be associated with the outcome of interest
  2. It must be associated with the exposure of interest
  3. It should not lie in the causal pathway between exposure and outcome.
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

True or False: A factor that is associated with both the outcome and the exposure but lies in the causal pathway is considered a confounder.

A

False

Such a factor is called a mediator.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

What is the first step in dealing with confounding?

A

Identify potential confounders.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

What does statistical adjustment for confounding aim to do?

A

Eliminate or reduce the confounding effect of potential confounders in any exposure-outcome association.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

What is the standard method for adjusting for confounding?

A

Using regression analysis.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

What is the purpose of stratification in confounding adjustment?

A

To control for confounding by examining exposure–outcome relationship within levels (strata) of a confounder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Fill in the blank: Crude estimates are simply estimates for exposure-outcome associations (Odds ratio, mean difference etc.) while adjusted estimates are estimates for exposure-outcome associations after applying statistical adjustment for any _____ variable.

A

potential confounder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

What would an age-adjusted estimate indicate in a study?

A

The measure of association between smoking and dementia if everyone had the same age.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

What is effect modification?

A
  • Occurs when effect of an exposure on an outcome differs depending on level of another variable.
  • A third variable changes the strength or direction of the effect
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

What is the Odds Ratio for lung cancer comparing high alcohol consumers to low consumers?

A

2.50 (95% CI: 2.30 - 2.90).

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

What would indicate that smoking is a potential confounder in the association between alcohol consumption and lung cancer?

A

If smoking is associated with both lung cancer and alcohol consumption, and does not lie in the causal pathway.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

In the context of confounding, what does it mean to adjust for a confounder?

A

To recalculate estimates for the exposure-outcome association while controlling for the confounder.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

What happens if the exposure-outcome association is different in the categories of the confounder?

A

The estimates cannot be combined and are presented separately.

20
Q

What percentage of smokers were included in the study?

21
Q

What percentage of non-smokers were included in the study?

22
Q

What is the odds ratio for smokers in the study?

23
Q

What is the odds ratio for non-smokers in the study?

24
Q

What is the combined (adjusted) odds ratio estimate?

25
How are the two estimates combined in the study?
In a weighted manner based on sample size
26
What is the crude odds ratio for the association between alcohol consumption and lung cancer before adjustment?
2.50
27
What does it indicate if the adjusted odds ratio is lower than the crude odds ratio?
The potential confounder explains a part of the association
28
What is one effect of adjustment on the estimate of exposure-outcome associations?
The association may disappear
29
True or False: Adjustment can make the association stronger.
True
30
What happens when a confounder is adjusted for but is actually a mediator?
Leads to underestimation of the true exposure-outcome association
31
What is an effect mediator?
Factors that lie on the causal pathway between exposure and outcome
32
What are the criteria for identifying potential effect mediators?
* Associated with the outcome * Associated with the exposure * Lies in the causal pathway
33
What is the first step in identifying a mediator?
Temporal ordering
34
What is a potential mediator identified in the study of physical activity and type 2 diabetes?
Skeletal muscle insulin sensitivity
35
What is the Relative Risk for T2DM comparing physically active individuals to inactive ones?
0.50
36
What is an example of an effect modifier in epidemiology?
Gender or obesity
37
How does high physical activity affect T2DM risk in men compared to women?
70% lower risk in men and 30% lower risk in women
38
What does effect modification imply about exposure-outcome associations?
They differ based on a third factor
39
What is the main focus of the study mentioned regarding physical activity and T2DM?
Investigating the association between physical activity and T2DM risk modified by obesity ## Footnote This study examines whether the relationship between physical activity and Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) differs based on obesity status.
40
What is effect modification in the context of this study?
The change in strength or direction of the association between physical activity and T2DM due to obesity ## Footnote Effect modification means that the effect of one variable (physical activity) on an outcome (T2DM) is different depending on the level of another variable (obesity).
41
What data is needed to investigate effect modification?
Stratification for the potential effect modifier ## Footnote This involves breaking down data into subgroups based on the effect modifier, in this case, obesity.
42
How does high physical activity affect the risk of T2DM among lean individuals?
High physical activity is associated with a 70% lower risk of T2DM among lean individuals ## Footnote This indicates a strong protective effect of physical activity against T2DM in lean individuals.
43
What is the association between high physical activity and T2DM risk among obese individuals?
High physical activity is associated with a 25% lower risk of T2DM among obese individuals ## Footnote This shows that while physical activity reduces T2DM risk in obese individuals, the effect is weaker compared to lean individuals.
44
True or False: There is no association between physical activity and T2DM in both lean and obese individuals.
False ## Footnote There is an association in both groups, but it is stronger in lean individuals.
45
Fill in the blank: Obesity is considered an _______ in the association between physical activity and T2DM.
effect modifier ## Footnote This means that obesity alters the relationship between physical activity levels and the risk of developing T2DM.
46
What does the example data suggest about T2DM risk among lean individuals with high physical activity?
There are 940 lean individuals with no or low T2DM risk and 60 with high T2DM risk ## Footnote This data supports the conclusion that high physical activity significantly lowers T2DM risk in lean individuals.
47
What does the example data suggest about T2DM risk among obese individuals with high physical activity?
There are 600 obese individuals with no or low T2DM risk and 200 with high T2DM risk ## Footnote This indicates that while high physical activity is beneficial for obese individuals, the risk remains higher compared to lean individuals.