Why do we care about selection?
degree/type of HL, audiometric confirguation, lifestyle, preference, monetary considerations
Why do we care about adjustments?
gain, feedback/occlusion adjustments, programs
What HA style is the easiest insertion and removal?
ITE > ITC > CIC
single unit, do not interfere with eyeglasses, may have removal strings
What HA style is the easiest on aid user control manipulation?
large BTEs > ITE > ITC
larger - more visible, can be located by touch, ease of volume control - AGC or remote control 4. Can always change volume and program through the app as well
Difficulty manipulating, wide dynamic, largest HA style, aid with a remote control, easily located tactually.
What HA style is the most invisibile?
deeply-seated CICs > CICs > RICs
solution to make larger HAs invisibile is to hide them with the hair. Grow out the hair if possible
HIgh gain and maximum o/p 2 principles
the farther the mic away from the ear canal entrance, the greater can be the gain without feedback and the larger the reciever and battery the greater the OSPL90 can be
RIC HAs (as compared to tradional BTEs) lack of tubing resonacnes result in
higher gain and OSPL90 in the very HFs
smoother shape across the high freqs
preferred over BTEs (when appropriate)
What HA style is the least sensitivt to wind noise (turbulence created by the head and pinna)?
deeply-seated CIC (would be least sensitivty) > CIC > ITC > ITE > BTE
best for joggers, people outside in the winter alot
Which HAs can have directional microphones?
BTEs, ITES, and larger ITCs (need larger HAs than smaller)
b/c directivity requires two microphones to create directionality, so not all HAs can have directional microphones. The smaller the HA, the fewer microphones can fit.
what are the greatest threats to reliability? What are the other threats?
moisture and cerumen
are parts that move or have electrical contacts (switchs, volume controls, battery contacts)
what HA style will be the least reliable?
anything inside the canal will be most susceptible: CIC, ITC, ITE
What solutions are possible for other threat to reliability?
nano-coating for waterproofing (almost all hearing aids do this) and chargers that take out the moisture when in the charger
What HA style is easiest to switch to the telecoil mode?
BTEs with manual switches or RICs with remote/app control (larger HAs will have)
What could we do about more difficult, smaller sized styled HAs (ITE and ITC) solution for telephone compatibility?
remote control and automatic switching, telephone- bluetooth- streaming interface device- wireless reciever- HA, acoustic signals can also be picked up
What HA style is easiest to clean for pateint with chronic ear infections?
CIC, ITC, ITE, and RIC are unsuitable.
Would want an alternate type if HA: BTE with a mold or a BAHA
dust- and water resistant coating
How could u solve avoidance of occlusion and feedback issues? What HA style is easiest to accomplish this task?
increase distance between mic and receiver.
RIC
What HA style is easiest to same day assess and fit?
non-custom > custom
What HA style is most expensive?
CIC b/c fitting smaller components is more labor-intensive and they have a higher return rate
Battery size is directly proportional to ….
battery life
Battery size is inversely proportional to ….
handling difficulties
when is volume control mostly not needed
if WDRC with low Compression threshold and high compressin ratio; if sound is too loud HA will automatically lower it for patient instead of patient manually changing it
What populations may benefit with having a volume control rather then on smartphone controls?
Those for whom WDRC does not achieve acceptable loudness
Those who strongly desire to control their HAs
Experienced HA wearers who are used to a volume control
Disadvantage of having a volume control?
Can be moved accidentally
Children or little dexterity who might accidentally switch
Inexperience: might turn it down when they shouldn’t because they should be hearing sounds, but they do not want to hear it (they should get the full experience)
Telecoil disadvantage
Size; if someone needs a small HA: could also take away a function to fit it in?
Solution is an automatic telecoil selection