describe the general model of JA
commonly used by IPAC
1. Determine the need for job analysis and define the set of positions to be analyzed
what is adequate JA information?
Job Elements Method
What is task analysis?
Describes observable job behaviors performed by workers, including data regarding what is accomplished, the tools and equipment used to accomplish it, and the verifiable characteristics of the job environment
Functional Job Analysis
tasks are related and ordered relative to three worker functions: data, people, and things. Tasks are also rated on a variety of other job context items
Abilities Analysis
Focuses on the human abilities needed to perform the work; it relies on a standard set of defined human abilities, instead of generating a new set of KSAO’s for every job
FJAS: a version of this method
Critical incidents
Collection of a series of anecdotes of job behavior that describe especially good or especially poor job performance
Multi-Purpose JA
-A method of job analysis that is based on the content validation model, and is designed to meet the requirements of the Uniform Guidelines, Test Standards, and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA)
a method of job analysis and the study of work performed, with the purpose of using the data collected to meet a number of needs in personnel management
-Why do MPJA?
to make the most effective use of resources
to have a true systems approach to managing personnel resources
Competency Modeling
what is it and how to do it in general
Competencies are underlying personal characteristics which are expressed in observable behaviors and actions
Skills
Knowledge
Self-Concepts
Sources of background information
Literature review Class specifications Relevant organizational charts Existing job descriptions Training manuals Regulatory materials Unions or Trade organizations
List of data collection techniques
considerations in choosing data collection methods
Purpose of the job analysis
Occupational complexity and variability (type, level, skills of incumbents, …)
Job/job group size and desired sample size
Location and work hours of incumbents
Availability and quality of existing data
Time, staff, and funds available
Degree of EEO need
Expertise of the analyst assigned (e.g., knowledge of the data collection method and occupation, skills, etc.)
Data analysis capability
general rule of thumb for job analysis methodology
Use two or more methods plus background information and literature review. Get needed rating data from SME’s
sample requirements
The sample composition should be representative of the employee group performing and supervising the work.
The sample size should be adequate
practical considerations for planning a JA
Defining the target job
Employee population
Clarifying purpose
Cost factors
The client
bodily elements of a good task statement
Task Statements are a Way of Showing, in Plain Language, by Using Descriptive Verbs:
summarize the characteristics of an adequate task statement
Contains specific information on each of the four parts of a task statement.
What is done (Action Verb)
To whom or what (Object)
To produce what (Expected Output)
Using what tools, equipment, work aids, processes
Is easy to read and understand.
Describes work which produces an identifiable product that could be used by someone other than the performer.
Describes work done by one person.
Describes an important part of the job.
Is specific enough for deriving KSA’s.
why use task statements?
Provide objective information needed to make decisions.
Simplify the process of deriving KSA’s.
Provide evidence needed to support a broad range of human resource decisions.
general purpose rating scales
Percent performing
Frequency
Importance
Time spent
Consequence of error
Entry level/Full performance
Relationship to successful performance
special purpose rating scales
Degree of supervision required
Training time required
Physical effort required
Task difficulty/Complexity
Quality of judgment
Environmental conditions
Impact on others
dichotomous rating scales; advantages and disadvantages
Always a forced choice between one thing and another
Advantages
Easy to understand
Easy to complete
Disadvantages
Rigid and Restrictive
Provides limited information
continuous rating scales; advantages and disadvantages
Always an open ended scale allowing a large number of possible values
-Advantages
Useful for obtaining a wide range of data
-Disadvantages
Analysis & Interpretation required
May distribute responses too broadly
discrete rating scales
A limited number of clearly delineated choices.
Advantages
Easy to understand
Easy to complete
Can obtain maximum useful information
Disadvantages
Hard to create non-overlapping benchmarks
May not match range of performance
Benchmarks rely on internal definitions of raters
What is an adequate KSA?
It is essential that KSA’s be:
Developed and verified by individuals who thoroughly understand the tasks performed
Clearly linked to tasks
Stated in specific and measurable terms
Clearly labeled as entry-level or full-performance
Supplemented by information on the extent to which possession of increasing degrees of the KSA differentiates among levels of job performance