What act sets out the purposes of sentencing?
The Criminal Justice Act 2003.
What must the court consider when sentencing?
What are the main aims of sentencing?
What is retribution?
This is the idea that we punish because the offender deserves punishment. The punishment must fit the crime and so the sentence must be proportionate to the crime that was committed. This theory was put forward by Von Hirsch who argued that we punish in order to redress the balance. When an offender commits a crime he has an advantage over the rest of society. Punishment is important as it takes away this advantage. ‘The violator ceases to be at an advantage over his non-violating fellow’. It is often known as the ‘just deserts theory. The crudest reform of retribution is an ‘eye for an eye and a tooth for a tooth’. In the UK retribution exists in the form of tariff sentencing, this is where recommended sentences are provided. The sentencing council is responsible for creating guidelines.
Evaluation of retribution?
This theory has been criticised for being short sighted as it is only concerned with punishment. It does not attempt to rehabilitate the offender in any way. It does not aim to reduce crime or alter the offenders behaviour. It is described by some as ‘institutionalised revenge’. It can be extremely unfair and it is often used to justify harsh sentences. It would not allow the use of ‘mitigating circumstances’ to reduce sentences. For example, a homeless person who committed theft would be treated the same as a person who was wealthy.
What is denunciation?
Denunciation is a way of society expressing disapproval of criminal activity. A sentence indicates to the offender and to society that offending behaviour has been condemned and that justice is being wrong. Denunciation also reinforces moral boundaries and teaches society right from wrong. For example, drink and driving campaigns have now made drink driving a morally frowned upon offence. However, it was previously considered to be acceptable behaviour. Denunciation and retribution usually go hand in hand.
Evaluation of denunciation?
Denunciation theory is problematic because it is limited, it simple denounces criminal behaviour but does not seek to reform offenders. It does not rehabilitate offenders. It can also be used to justify excessive penalties.
What is incapacitation?
Incapacitation states that punishment is necessary if only to prevent an offender from committing further crimes. This protects society from offending behaviour. Of course, the ultimate penalty is the death penalty and in some countries thieves have their hands cut off to prevent further thieving. In America, sex offenders have been incapacitated by medical treatment. Banning drink drivers from driving is also a form of incapacitation. Also a curfew requirement as part of Community Order incapacities through tagging and insisting that offenders remain at home at certain times.
Evaluation of incapacitation?
Incapacitation leads to huge populations, over the last 5 years the prison population has risen by nearly 20,000. This is extremely costly, this UK has one of the highest prison populations in Europe and yet the crime rate is higher than in many other countries. Incapacitation does not try to reform offending behaviour and it is very limited. It is often used with recidivists, people who continue to offend and people who present a threat to society.
What are the two parts of the deterrence theory?
Individual and general.
What is individual deterrence?
Individual deterrence sentencing is concerned with deterring the individual from committing further offences. Excessive sentences can be used here such as heavy fines and lengthy custodial sentences. It assumes that an offender will stop to think about the consequences of his offending behaviour when in fact many offences are committed on the spur of the moment. Much of offending behaviour is also committed through either drugs or alcohol.
Evaluation of individual deterrence?
Individual deterrence sentences can lead to unfair and excessive punishments such as in R V Whitton 1985 where a football hooligan was given a life sentence for football hooligan. Prison is not an effective deterrent as 55% of adult prisoner re-offend withing 2 years of release. The rate is even higher for young offenders at about 80%.
What is general deterrence?
This operates on the basis that excessive penalties will act as a deterrent to the rest of the population. For example in R V Whitton the sentence was given to deter the rest of the population. In R V Ezair 2001 the defendant had robbed a Manchester University student, there had been 700 robberies that year in the vicinity of the university and the judge described this as ‘a blot on the City of Manchester’. He sentenced Ezair to 4 years in prison as a deterrent to others.
Evaluation of general deterrence?
The main problem with general deterrence is excessive penalties. It can lead to lengthy sentences purely to make a point to the rest of society. It is also difficult to measure its effectiveness. America has the death penalty to deter criminals but it has the highest homicide rate in the world. In the UK, evidence does suggest that the cracking down on drink driving has led to a reduction in crime relating to this offence. Critics point out that theory of individual deterrence assumes that offenders stop to consider the consequences of their actions. Most crimes are spur of the moment actions and many are committed under the influence of drink and drugs When there was a police strike in Liverpool in 1919 planned crimes e.g. burglaries, increased but it made no difference to violent crimes. Fear of being caught is more of a deterrent but while crime detection rates are low the threat of a severe penalty is too remote to have much of an impact. General deterrence relies on publicity of severe punishment. It is in direct conflict with the principle of retribution as it involves sentencing offenders to a longer term than is deserved for the specific offence. It is probably the least effective and least fair principle of sentencing.
What is rehabilitation?
The main aim of the theory is to rehabilitate the offender so they can return to normal society and not commit any further offences. Rehabilitation philosophy is reflected in many of the community penalties such as supervision orders, drug treatment and testing orders. Persistent offender are usually less likely to respond to reformative sentences. Powers of Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 states that in considering the seriousness of the offence the court may take into consideration any previous failures to respond to previous sentences.
Evaluation of rehabilitation?
The problem with rehabilitation is that it leads to individualised sentences and this therefore leads to disproportionate sentences and sentencing inconsistency. Offenders who have committed exactly the same crime may be given different sentences. Another criticism is that it tends to discriminate against the underprivileged, those from poorer backgrounds are less likely to be seen as candidates for reform.
What is reparation?
This is aimed at compensating the victim of crime. An offender may be ordered to pay a sum of money or to return stolen property or complete unpaid community work. Section 130 of Powers of the Criminal Courts (Sentencing) Act 2000 requires the courts to give reasons if they do not make a compensation order. The concept of restitution to society as a whole exists, the main way this is done is when offenders are required to work on a community project.
What are the adult custodial sentences?
The Criminal Justice Act 2003 says prison sentences should only be passed when the crime is so serious that neither a fine nor a community sentence is justified. Prison is only available where the offender is over 21. There are various types of sentencing:
What are the adult community penalties?
The Criminal Justice Act 2003 creates one community order with different requirements:
- the unpaid work requirement which requires the defendant to work for between 40 and 300 hours on a project organised by probation. It can entail painting school buildings, mending fences etc.
- prohibited activity requirement which allows activities to be prohibited such as wearing a hoodie, carrying paint or spray cans if the defendant has been charged with criminal damage.
- curfew requirement, an offender can be ordered to remain within a fixed address for between 2 and 16 hours within a 24 hour period. The order lasts up to 12 months, it is often enforced by electronic tagging.
- exclusion requirement, offenders are excluded from entering certain places at certain times of day on set days e.g. pubs, clubs or football grounds. It can be imposed for up to 2 years for those over 16 and three months for those under 16.
- supervision requirement, an offender is placed under the supervision of a probation officer for a period of up to three years.
There are a number of requirements designed to rehabilitate and these are:
- a mental health requirement, this requires an offender to seek mental health treatment provision in the form of classes and therapy.
- a drug rehabilitation requirement, this will require an offender to attend a drug rehabilitation centre and it incorporates regular testing to ensure compliance.
- an alcohol treatment requirement, this requires an offender to follow an alcohol treatment programme.
What are other sentences for adults?
What are youth offenders?
Offenders aged between 10 and 17 are classed as youth offenders and are usually tried in the Youth Court except in serious cases where the case is heard in the Crown Court. Under Section 142 of the Criminal Justice Act 2003, the main aim of youth sentencing is to prevent re-offending and rehabilitate the offender.
Pre-court sentencing or disposals: reprimands and warnings?
These are disposals available in the youth justice system for those offenders who have committed a first offence or who plead guilty to an offence. These are not sentences but they are used by the police to deal with young offenders without bringing a case to court.
A reprimand is a formal warning given by the police to someone who admitted committing an offence or who has been caught committing an offence. The offence must be a minor first offence and the youth is given the opportunity to voluntarily participate in a programme run by the Youth Offending Team.
A final warning is similar to a reprimand but is given for a second minor offence to which the youth pleads guilty. The Youth Offending Team programme becomes compulsory in this instance and a programme of activites will be written to address the offending behaviour.
Youth offending teams: each local authority has to establish at least one team in their area. This is a panel of people consisting of police officers, members of the probation service and other key individuals who assist in the rehabilitation of young offenders. Any offender who has been warned must be referred to the team, youth courts can also refer.
What are custodial penalties for youth offenders?
Community penalties for youth offenders?
Community penalties for young offenders are now governed by an Youth Rehabilitation Order, introduced under the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008. The court can mix and match requirements to suit the offender, young offenders are supervised by the Youth Offending Team. The requirements that can be attached to a Youth Rehabilitation Order are as follows:
- an activity requirement, this requires attendance at educational and training classes and they will concentrate on CV writing and interview techniques.
- attendance centre requirement, for those aged between 10 and 25. It involves attendance at a special centre for 2 to 3 hours a week. There is a minimum of 12 hours and a maximum of 36.
- supervision requirement, those under 18 are placed under the supervision of the social services, a probation officer or a youth offending team. This can be a part of an action plan order which can combine a number of requirements such as participating in set activities, presenting him/herself to a specified person or to attend an attendance centre.
- unpaid work requirement, for those aged 16 or 17 at the time of their conviction.
- a prohibited activity requirement
- a curfew requirement
- an exclusion requirement
- an education requirement, aimed at those in education.
- a residence requirement, an offender under the age of 17 can be placed in the care of the local authority.
- a drug treatment requirement, teamed up with a drug testing requirement.
- fines, for 10 to 13 year olds up to £250 and for 14 to 17 year olds up to £1000.
- reparation order, this can be given to anyone under 18 and can be made to make reparation to either the victim or community at large.
- discharges, absolute and conditional discharges are also available for young offenders.
Parental responsibility - under the Criminal Justice Act 2003, parents have to agree to be bound over to keep their child under control. If the child commits an offence during the period of the bind over, which can be up to one year then the parents are fined up £1000. The courts can also make parenting orders which are intended to offer training and support to parents to help them change their child’s offending behaviour.