What is a tautology in TFL?
A TFL sentence that is true on every valuation
Its truth-table has a T in every row under the main connective.
What is a contradiction in TFL?
A TFL sentence that is false on every valuation
Its truth-table has an F in every row under the main connective.
What is a contingency in TFL?
A TFL sentence that is true on some valuations and false on others
Its truth-table has both Ts and Fs under the main connective.
True or false: A tautology is informative.
FALSE
A tautology is not informative because it is true regardless of the situation.
True or false: A contradiction is informative.
FALSE
A contradiction is not informative because it is false regardless of the situation.
True or false: A contingency is informative.
TRUE
A contingency is informative because it can be true or false depending on the situation.
What does it mean for sentences to be logically equivalent?
They are true and false under the exact same conditions
This means they have the same truth values in every valuation.
What does it mean for sentences to be jointly consistent?
There is at least one valuation on which they are all true together
This indicates that the sentences can coexist without contradiction.
What does it mean for sentences to be jointly inconsistent?
There is no valuation on which they are all true together
This indicates that the sentences cannot coexist without contradiction.
An argument is valid
if and only if the premises entail the conclusion
This definition emphasizes the relationship between premises and conclusion in logical arguments.
An argument is valid
if and only if it is not possible that the premises are all true and the conclusion is false
This definition highlights the necessity of the conclusion being true when the premises are true.
An inference or argument of the form: A 1, A 2, …, A n ∴ B is logically valid iff
In each consistent valuation in which all premises A 1, A 2, …, A n are true, the conclusion B is also true
This definition provides a formal structure for assessing the validity of arguments.