Place cells in linear track
Place cell response can also be measured in a linear track
Respond at one location in track - 1d, x
Their responses to deformation (shortening) can be measured
Cells firing at all locations so can represent space
Position on track represented = not actual distance
Order of firing the same even if compress representation
linear track in another dimension
Sound dimension
Press lever and hold, increasing sound as press
No spatial navigation tho
One get to certain frequency = get reward and release lever
Travelling in sound space
Similar to traversing a 1d track in physical space
tuning to location in sound sequence
Hippocampal cells are often tuned to specific location in sound sequence
Similar to tuning linear track
Recording in hippo, tuning to single location around sound axis
Tile whole of sound
Cells in ca1
what would be a control experiment to show that a cell is not just responding to sound frequency
How do we know its not tuned to diff frequencies
= change sound
Change contingencies - not being rewarded, not pressing level or reward, just hearing sound
cell responses are…
Dependent on context
descrive passive playback - what does place cells do
Pace cell - like neuron does not respond if same sound freq profile is played passively outside of task
No activation, so suggests it is task - 1d navigation
So does have to do wirh navigating envir
tuning correspondence across spaces
Record animal in task and put in box - have them navigate in box
Cell 1= put animal in box while navigation and see it looks like place cell
Cel 2 = wont always have a response in both tasks
Some cells showing tuning to single location in sound sequence
As well as place tuning in random exploration
Cells in CA1
But if have response in both tasks = looks like place cell
Single lcoation of space - not structured or repeated intervals tho
Correspondence bewteen place cell in classic sense - sort of single lcoation responses in 1d navigation
grid cells across cognitive spaces
Etr cortex
Some cells show tuning to multiple locations in sound sequence as well as grid tuning in random exploration
See grid cells - several peaks, repeated intervals, repeated structure in some task - respond to multiple locations
Complicated structure
Representing something common irrespective of space
grid cell spacing
Varies with anatomical lcoation
Diff grid cells tile space with diff lattices with diff orientations and diff scales
Peaks closer = finer details
Peaks far = represent bigger space
spacing correspondence across spaces
Navigation vs sound task = grid cells
Grid cells with wider fields in spatial envir also have wider fields in sound task = suggest shared neural mechanisms
3 sets of spacing distribution - matches with sound task
Module 1 = tends to have smaller fields in sound task, modules 2/3 = wider
Look how far peaks are but in time (for sound task)
= GRID cells in both tasks- precise grid cells in navigation
shared neural mechanisms for maps
Key properties of tuning across cells
Structure and size of features
More general- involved in many tasks
Place cells - at location, shared
Grid cells = structures rep, share key properties
COMMON circuit mechanism in hippocampal-entorhinal system are used to represent diverse behavioural tasks, possibly supporting cognitive processes beyond spatial navigation
cogntive maps across dimensions
Spatial —> cognitive maps
Apply to abstract thinking
Navigate space that is not pshycial but probabuly still has simailr attributes
Not just analogy - it’s actually encoding diff spaces in same way
identifying grid like representations in humans
Hard, deep in brain
Can leverage structure fo grid fields (symmetric) to identify areas that have grid like rep in navigation
Use fmri - task= navigate vr world in scanner
:. Method identifies etr cortex and mpfc
= have grid like reps
navigating an abstract space
Navigation in abstract spaces
We can navigate 2d space of bird shapes - where leg and neck length varies (smooth transition)
Or can have completely random abstract obejcts and have to learn transition bewteen objects
Simailr to navigation In phsycial or virtual 2d space
similar areas are activated while navigating tehse spaces
Navigation in the 2 spaces = identifies etr and mpfc in fmri exps as having grid like representations
Suggests navigation system is not just used for navigation in physical envir but it is a more general system for navigating spaces that ahve relational structure
Irrespective of type of space you navigate - any type of space with relational structure between things
transitive inference requires what
A map
describe how transitive inference requires a map
Need general map
Get snippets of transition then put them together in a coherent space = allows you to knwo structure of space as a whole
Maps allow you to do transitive inferences - have to build global rep
= build space from single interactions
Breakdown of experience, inference and choice at test time in spatial navigation and transitive inference relies on chaining together separately observed sequences of observations
testing transitivity in preferences = set up
Pairs of stimuli presented together - one stimulus rewarded per pair
Test on pairs not experienced to test whether ordered presentation is being represented
testing transitivity in preferences =results
Lesion Entorhinal cortices or the fornix (output of hippocampus) vs control group (lesion parietal cortex)
Deficit in pair requiring computing transitivity
- accurate on middle pairs, all lesions do well
- deficit in b vs d relational probe = need to ahve map to know b>c and c>d, animals with lesion in navigation system = perform at chance level and lack ability to build map and relational structure
No deficit in end pair test = a vs e and in random pairing (wx and yz- no one knows what to do )
:. These areas needed to build ordered representations - map
what is needed for transitivity in preferences
hippocampus and navigation system
reprsenting task structure
Many Hippocampal neurons exhibit spatially specific firing, firing of place cells encodes animals position in envir
Ex 1 = maze, spatial navigation in same way = shares task structure with ex 2
Ex 2= nose poke smell to diff outcomes, initiate responses - same then separates Depending on which chosen
Basically equivalent but think about them differently
can both types of representations co exist??
Can ahve purely spatial or task representation
- should think about them both when look at decision
Is it in pshycial space or more abstract transitions between events
learning structure over tasks
Harlows task = diff instantiations of task share common underlying structure - only one object is rewarded, images chnage tho
= can be exploited to facilitate faster learning
Over multiple exposures to task = monkeys acquire underlying structure - learning set, and use it to learn faster in new instantiations - learns over tine = then will be more accurate and pick object quickly (takes only 1 trial to know which object to pick)
Learning higher level abstract representation of task
Ofc Lesions= explain
Deficit in tracking changing reward probabilities
If lesion = can’t switch
Monkeys can also learn to track changing probabilities of reward but ofc lesions cause deficit = can track changes in reward unless best option
Lesions broad here so large effects