SRP IP PFC

Question 1

Flop

HU vs check:

Answer 1

stab entire range, 1/2 pot

Question 2

Flop

HU vs. c-bet:

Answer 2

We should be calling all draws, most pairs, and most BDFD hands

• Nuances are too complicated to write heuristics for and will need to be handled in the libraries using real hands.
• C-bet sizing also affects our calibration, causing us to fold more vs larger sizings.

Question 3

Flop

Multi-way vs. c-bet:

Answer 3

Increase requirements substantially for weakest calls relative to HU. Gutters+ and mid-pair + is a good starting instruction.

This metric lacks any positional sensitivity, so increase requirements even more against the tightest formations

Question 4

Flop

Multi-way vs. X:

Answer 4

bet medium-strength pairs+ and robust draws (gutters+), 1/2 pot.

Question 5

Turn:

HU after villain B-X:

Answer 5

• stab entire range, 1/2 pot.
• An alternate hotspot to randomize aggression in known pools you can check back bluffs on the turn and use the C-X-B hotspot on the river for 1/2 or 2x pot.

Question 6

Turn

HU vs. XC-X:

Answer 6

barrel top pair+, gutters+, 1/2 pot.

Question 7

Turn

HU after villain B-B:

Answer 7

A stable heuristic is to call all draws, MP+.

• Nuances are too complicated to write heuristics for and will need to be handled in the libraries using real hands.
  *
• C-bet sizing also affects our calibration, causing us to fold more vs larger sizings. Multi-way causes us to gear up requirements substantially.

Question 8

Turn

Vs. XR:

Answer 8

Autofold bluff catchers. Draws need to be assessed on a case-by-case basis considering implied and direct pot odds.