Stability vs. Change: 2 important issues to consider
- consistency over time
consistency across situations
Situationist perspective vs. trait psychologist perspective
consistency across time: 2 factors to consider
- Personality coherence
Situational specificity
certain situations can provoke behaviour that is out of character for an individual (ex. Survival situations)
Strong situations
situations in which most people react in a similar way (ex. Public speaking)
weak situations
when situations are weak or ambiguous, personality has its strongest influence (ex. When someone smiles at you – are they being friendly or do they like me?)
situational selection
Tendency to choose or select situations in which one finds oneself, as a function of personality (ex. Extroverts more likely to choose highly social situations)
evocation
Certain personality traits may (naturally) evoke specific responses from others (ex. Neurotic behaviour evokes anxious/hostile response in others)
manipulation
Various means by which people (intentionally) influence the behaviour of others; altering existing environments; includes things like charm, coercion, and silent treatment (ex. Helping someone in hopes that they’ll help you later)
person-environment fit
practical implications of having good person-environment fit
Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI)
- Based on Carl Jung’s 8 psychological types
Problems with Myers-Brigs
aggregation
measures of personality stability/change
- mean-level stability/change
rank-order stability/change
mean-level stability/change
2 key qualities for personality change
personality coherance
3 levels of personality analysis
population level analysis
group differences level analysis
individual differences level analysis