Correlations + eval
analyse strength and direction between co variables from -1 to +1
plot covariables on a scattergraph
+Establish strength between 2 variables and measure precisely
+Predictions can be made based on correlations
+Can investigate things that cannot be manipulated experimentally for ethical or practical reasons
- Cause and effect unclear
- Third variables - correlation and causation
- Doesnt detect curvilinear relationships - positive until a certain point then negative (e.g enzymes) or vice versa
What do significance levels mean
Level at which decision made to reject null hypothesis, so how sure we are IV is acc having affect on DV and not by chance. Significance level = probability that the null hypothesis is accepted by chance
Conventional significance levels for errors
Type 1 error = false positive = probability that null hypothesis is wrongly rejected = significance level
Type 2 error = false negative = probability that null hypothesis is wrongly accepted - harder to calculate as depends on strength of effects and sample size etc
5% commonly used as a middling fair value to minimise both errors, but sometimes 10% used for more lenient experiments, and sometimes 1% used for stricter topics like medicine (where type 1 errors cannot happen)
Levels of Measurement
Nominal - discrete data in separate categories e.g eye colour, one person can only be in one category
Ordinal - continuous data with some sort of ordering or ranking e,g listing music genres in rank order, or using own scales e.g scale of 1-10 with arbitrary units
Interval - continuous data in equal intervals like height or time
Parametric vs non parametric tests
Parametric tests more robust, rely on actual data rather than rank/categories and more likely to accurately detect significance
Require interval data, somewhat normally distributed population and similar variance of scores between conditions (so standard deviation is similar)
Factors to choose a test
Whether it is correlation (spearman’s rho or pearsons r) association (chi squared) or difference (everything else)
Research design - independent measures (chi squared, mann whitney u, unrelated t) , repeated measures/matched participants (these 2 joined together)(sign, wilcoxon, related t)
Level of measurement - nominal (chi squared, sign test, chi squared), ordinal (mann whitney u, wilcoxon, spearman’s rho), interval/parametric (unrelated t, related t, pearsons r)
Use mnemonic Carrots Should Come Mashed With Swede Under Roast Potatoes
Critical value
numerical value that helps determine significance of results by comparison to test stat - boundary value of something that doesn’t normally happen under the null hypothesis
Spearman’s rho
relationship/correlation, ordinal data, related pairs, non parametric
Strength from -1 (-ive) to +1 (+ive correlation)
Test against crit value using modulus but then convert back to -ive if needed for description of results
If test stat more than equal to crit value then significant
Mann Whitney
Difference, independent groups, ordinal data, non parametric
Formulas used for test value
If smaller or equal to critical value then significant
Chi-squared
Difference/association, independent data, nominal, non-parametric
Same method as FM
Test stat must be greater or equal to critical value to be significant
Wilcoxon
Difference, related pairs, ordinal, non-parametric
Test stat formulated
Must be less than or equal to critical value to be significant
Sign test
Difference, related pairs, nominal, non-parametric
Make a hypothesis (1/2 tailed), then work out the sign change for each participant by doing experimental score - control score, then total up number of + and - where test statistic S is lower value
N is number of participants but ignore 0 scorers
Then match up critical value where S needs to be equal to or less than for it to be significant
Pearson’s r
Correlation/relationship, related pairs, interval data, parametric test
Same method as fm PMCC
Test stat must be greater than or equal to critical value to be significant
Related t-test
Difference, related pairs, interval, parametric
Test stat formulated
Crit value based on df = number of pairs - 1
must be greater or equal to critical value to be significant
Unrelated t-test
Difference, independent groups, interval, parametric
Test stat formulated
Crit value based on df = total sample size of both groups - 2
must be greater than or equal to crit value to be significant