ISA and RSA
althusser - agreed with humanistic marxists about dual functions of state but different terms
repressive state apparatus - parts of state that coerce the proletariat into accepting bourgeois dominance
ideological state apparatus - institutions that manipulate the proletariat into accepting capitalism as legitimate
rejecting the economic base / superstructure model
Althusser rejected both economic determinism of traditional marxism and the emphasis on free will of humanistic marxists
economic level, political level, ideological level
all have relative autonomy and two-way causality
rejecting gramsci
rejected view we are authors of our actions
while we may think we are authors of our actions - illusion created by ISAs - we are products of pre-existing structures that map out our lives for us
ISAs socialise us into filling our allotted places in the relations of production
revolution will only occur if crisis in capitalism - contradictions at different levels of three structures - over-determinations
strengths
Craib - offers the most sophisticated conception of social structure available in the social sciences
limitations
Althusser’s structural marxism is also deterministic - structural determinism rather than economic
this is done by stressing structural factors - allowing individuals little free will
overlooks the role played by working classes in struggling against capitalism
discourages political activism as political activism wont cause change