what is a structured interview?
example
willmott and young’s research of extended family in east london
positive practical factors
(+) cheap; training is straightforward since they only follow a set of instructions
(+) suitable for gathering straight forward factual information
(+) data can be quantified easily because they use close questions with coded answers which makes it suitable for hypothesis testing
negative ethical factors
(-) some people may be uncomfortable with talking about their past
(-) people may lie/change answers because they might feel embarrassed
negative validity factors
(-) it uses closed questions which restricts interviewers to choose from limited numbers of preset answers
(-) no freedom to explain questions/clarify misunderstanding
positive reliability factors
(+) they’re reliable because it is easy for the researcher to standardised/control them
(+) ensures each interview is conducted precisely the same way, same questions, same order/wording
(+) provides structure for others
positive representative factors
(+) large sample size who can be surveyed which increases chances of obtaining a representative sample of the population
feminist critique
Hilary Graham says that the survey methods like questionnaires and structured interviews are patriarchal and gave distorted picture of women’s experience.
why would Positivists prefer this