Name the 3 stages of the development in children’s moral reasoning (Piaget)
rules not understood
rules come from higher authority and cannot be changed
evaluate actions based on outcomes
punishment = invitable retribution
rules are created by people and can be changed by mutual consent
evaluate actions by intentions
punishment as chosen to fit crime
Discuss 4 criticisms of Piaget’s theory
Describe the stages of Kohlberg’s theory of moral judgement
Moral development proceeds through specific series of stages that are discontinuous and hierarchical. So, each new stage reflects qualitatively different, more adequate way of thinking.
Does everyone move through Kohlberg’s stages and do they reach all stages?
everyone moves through them in the same order but differ in how many stages they attain
What kind of people show higher-level moral judgement?
People who have:
Name the 1/3 level of Kohlberg’s stages of moral judgement development
Name the 2/3 level of Kohlberg’s stages of moral judgement development
Name the 3/3 level of Kohlberg’s stages of moral judgement development
- what are each centered and focused on?
Stage 1 (Punishment and Obedience Orientation) of Kohlberg
Stage 2 (Instrumental and exchange orientation) of Kohlberg
Stage 3 (mutual interpersonal expectations, relationships and interpersonal conformity) of Kohlberg
Stage 4 (social system and conscience orientation) of Kohlberg
Stage 5 (social system and conscience orientation) of Kohlberg
Stage 6 (Universal ethical principles)
Discuss 4 criticisms of Kohlberg’s theory
Prosocial Behaviour
Voluntary behavior intended to benefit another, such as helping, sharing, and comforting of others.
How does prosocial moral judgement change with age?
children’s prosocial moral judgement becomes more abstract and based more on internalized principles and values.
Name the 5 levels of prosocial moral reasoning (Eisenberg)
Stage l of prosocial moral reasoning (Eisenberg): Hedonistic self-focused orientation
Individual is concerned with own interests rather than moral considerations.
Reasons for (not) assisting include:
- Expectation of direct personal gain/future reciprocation
- Whether one needs/likes another person
Stage 2 of prosocial moral reasoning (Eisenberg): needs-based orientation
Individual is concerned with physical, material, and psychological needs of others even when these conflict with own needs.
- Expressed with verbal expressions of sympathy or reference to emotions (pride or guilt).
Stage 3 of prosocial moral reasoning (Eisenberg): approval and/or stereotyped orientation
Individual justifies engagement (or not) in prosocial behavior on basis of others’ approval and/or on stereotyped images of good and bad behavior.