Terms Flashcards

(47 cards)

1
Q

Interfoto v stiletto visual productions

A

Particularly harsh or unusual terms must be brought to the other sides atatention or made prominent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Kendall v William lillico

A

Terms may be incorporated by a course of dealings if they are regular and consistent

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

British crane hire v Ipswich plant hire

A

Terms may be implied by custom as long as both parties are aware and that thjere was a common understanding pf the terms to be used

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

Expressed terms

A

Specifically agreed between` the parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Implied terms

A

Not explicitly stated in the contractor but are none the less are part of the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What are the 3 categories of term

A

Condition, warranty and innominate term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

A condition

A

A term that is central to the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Poussard v spires

A

Actress had lead role in a production, failed to attend performances gave role to understands as she has breached contratc

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

A warranty

A

A minor term in a contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Bettini v gye

A

Singer was contracted to perform at a series of concerts a 6 days of rehearsals, missed 3 rehearsals, only a breach

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Innominate terms

A

No a condition or a warranty it depends on the consequences

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Hong Kong fir shipping v Kawasaki

A

Chartered a ship for 2 yeas, needed repairs that took 18 months- a warranty

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Couchman v hill

A

Auction- heifer was pregnant- if a statement is important to the contract it is seen as a term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q
A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Courts will imply a term into a contract if the term is necessary-

A

If it is necessary, if the parties thought about it would they have agreed to it going into the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

The moorcock

A

Implied safe mooring

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Officious bystander test

A

If a bystander suggested the term would both parties of agreed

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Holier v rambler motors

A

Failure to sign document did not stip terms being present- oversight

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Shell v lostock garage

A

Terms will not be implied if the partus would have never agreeed if thought about

20
Q

Egan v scc

A

Would a reasonable person understood the terms

21
Q

Marks and spencer v bnp paribas

A

Reasonableness should eb judges objectively in considering what the parties would have agreed to

22
Q

Hutton v warren

A

Terms implied by custom

23
Q

Hillas v arcos

A

Terms implied by pervious dealings

24
Q

S9 consumer rights

A

Satisfactory quality

25
S10 consumer rights act
Fit for purpose
26
S11 consumer rights act
Relating to description
27
S20 consumer rights act
Right to reject
28
S23 consumer rights act
Right to repair or replacement
29
S24 consumer rights act
Final right to reject
30
S49 supply of services
Reasonable care and skill
31
S52 supply and service
Reasonable times
32
Supply of service remedies
Repeat performance or price reduction
33
Lestrange v graucob
Where a written agreement is signed they are generally bound
34
Curtis v chemical cleaning
An oral statement may be more important than what is written
35
Olley v Marlborough court hotel
A new term cannot be added to the contract after acceptance
36
Chapelton v Barry
Unreasonable to assume the would see the ticket as a contractual document
37
Thompson v London midland and Scottish railways
Common knowledge that railways journeys were contracts the fact she could did read did not change this
38
Thornton v shoe lane parking
Cannot incoperate terms after contract
39
Holier v rambler motors
Can incorporate terms through previous dealings
40
Mccutcheon v David macbrayne
Where a term is not consistent it is not incorporated
41
Contra preferente rule
Where there is doubt about a term the words will be construed against the person who put them in the contract
42
S2.1 unfair contract terms
Cannot exclude death or personal injury
43
S2.2 unfair contracts term
Liability for loss or damage exclusion needs to be reasonable
44
S31 consumer rights act
Cannot exclude or limit liability for sections of the act relating to goods
45
S57 consumer rights
Cannot exclude or limit liability for sections of the act relating to the supply or services
46
S65 consumer rights act
Cannot exclude death or personal injury
47
S62 consumer rights act
All terms must be fair