what are terms
terms are the details of what has been agreed between 2 parties
what are the different types of contract terms
conditions, warranties and innominate terms
what is a condition of a contract
a condition is a major term of the contract - terms so important that failure to fulfil them defeats purpose of the contract
what is the effect of breaching a condition
the contract can be repudiated
this means the parties do not have to go through with the contract
what is the case for conditions
Poussard v Spiers and Pond
what was the decision in Poussard v Spiers and Pond
Actually performing in the lead role was the main part of her contract - therefore was a condition
what is a warranty
a minor term of the contract , failure to fulfill them doe snot defeat purpose of contract
what is the effect of breaching a warranty
the contract still exist and continues but damages can be paid to the victim
what is the case for warranty
Bettini v Gye
what was the decision in Bettini v Gye
-attending the rehearsals was not the main part of the contract
-therefore the terms regarded rehearsals as a warranty
-due to it being a warranty his failure to show up to rehearsal meant he had to pay damages to the director but the contract continued and he still had his part
what are the two cases to determine if something is a condition or a warranty
Poussard v Spiers and Pond
Bettini v Gye
what is the case for the parties themselves may have specified what the term is
Schuler v Wickman Machine Tools
why did the court say this was not actually a condition in Schuler v Wickman Machine Tools
here it was virtually impossible for W to make all 1400 trips and it seemed unlikely the parties would want the whole contratc to end if he missed even one for valid reasons such as being ill
- therefore unreasonable for this to be a condition despite it being called that
what is an innominate term
a very broad term
what happens if an innominate term is breached
breaching innominate terms can repudiate the contract( if breach is so serious it defeats contract ) or only lead to damages ( if not so serious and purpose of contract can continue )
what is the case for innominate terms
Hong Kong Kir Shipping
how does the court decide if an innominate term is a serious breach or not
looks at whether breach deprived party of substantially whole benefit of contract
put this test for innominate term into own words
has breach taken away/defeated main purpose of contract
what was decided in Hong Kong Kir Shipping
Lord Diplock decided the party had not been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of contract because they only last a few weeks out of 2 years
why was the concept of innominate terms developed
provided a useful way of dealing with broad terms that could be breached in a serious or not so serious way
why might the concept of innominate terms create problems
lack in certainty (i.e contract might have same exact wording but in one case can be different condition
what is the case that shows the court being reluctant to use the concept of innominate terms
The Mihalis Angelos (1970) / Bunge Corporation
what is the case for when the courts were willing to find innominate terms in a contract
Cehave v Bremer