Terms: Classification P3 Section B Flashcards

(23 cards)

1
Q

what are terms

A

terms are the details of what has been agreed between 2 parties

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

what are the different types of contract terms

A

conditions, warranties and innominate terms

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

what is a condition of a contract

A

a condition is a major term of the contract - terms so important that failure to fulfil them defeats purpose of the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

what is the effect of breaching a condition

A

the contract can be repudiated
this means the parties do not have to go through with the contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

what is the case for conditions

A

Poussard v Spiers and Pond

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

what was the decision in Poussard v Spiers and Pond

A

Actually performing in the lead role was the main part of her contract - therefore was a condition

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

what is a warranty

A

a minor term of the contract , failure to fulfill them doe snot defeat purpose of contract

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

what is the effect of breaching a warranty

A

the contract still exist and continues but damages can be paid to the victim

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

what is the case for warranty

A

Bettini v Gye

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

what was the decision in Bettini v Gye

A

-attending the rehearsals was not the main part of the contract
-therefore the terms regarded rehearsals as a warranty
-due to it being a warranty his failure to show up to rehearsal meant he had to pay damages to the director but the contract continued and he still had his part

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

what are the two cases to determine if something is a condition or a warranty

A

Poussard v Spiers and Pond
Bettini v Gye

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

what is the case for the parties themselves may have specified what the term is

A

Schuler v Wickman Machine Tools

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

why did the court say this was not actually a condition in Schuler v Wickman Machine Tools

A

here it was virtually impossible for W to make all 1400 trips and it seemed unlikely the parties would want the whole contratc to end if he missed even one for valid reasons such as being ill
- therefore unreasonable for this to be a condition despite it being called that

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

what is an innominate term

A

a very broad term

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

what happens if an innominate term is breached

A

breaching innominate terms can repudiate the contract( if breach is so serious it defeats contract ) or only lead to damages ( if not so serious and purpose of contract can continue )

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

what is the case for innominate terms

A

Hong Kong Kir Shipping

17
Q

how does the court decide if an innominate term is a serious breach or not

A

looks at whether breach deprived party of substantially whole benefit of contract

18
Q

put this test for innominate term into own words

A

has breach taken away/defeated main purpose of contract

19
Q

what was decided in Hong Kong Kir Shipping

A

Lord Diplock decided the party had not been deprived of substantially the whole benefit of contract because they only last a few weeks out of 2 years

20
Q

why was the concept of innominate terms developed

A

provided a useful way of dealing with broad terms that could be breached in a serious or not so serious way

21
Q

why might the concept of innominate terms create problems

A

lack in certainty (i.e contract might have same exact wording but in one case can be different condition

22
Q

what is the case that shows the court being reluctant to use the concept of innominate terms

A

The Mihalis Angelos (1970) / Bunge Corporation

23
Q

what is the case for when the courts were willing to find innominate terms in a contract

A

Cehave v Bremer