Teleological Theory
Suggests that each thing in the world has some purpose, and what is right is what leads to that ultimate purpose. Therefore, the proper purpose of a thing must be defined before the proper action leading to its fulfillment can be determined.
Utilitarianism
The maximization of human well-being and the absence of pain (opposite of happiness) is the desired moral outcome.
Consequentialism
The rightness of an action is determined by its consequences.
Hedonism
Utility is the pursuit of well-being and the absence of pain or harm.
Maximalism
The focus is on the greatest amount of well-being for the greatest number of people.
Univeralism
Everyone’s happiness must be considered and one’s own interest cannot count for more than those of others.
Shortcomings of Utilitarian Theory
Deontological Theory
Argues that the right action in any situation stems from the obligation to behave morally in every circumstance, and that the intention or principles behind actions must be morally pure. The act must be intrinsically moral to be right.
Kantian Ethics
Maxims should be judged as moral or not, and a moral maxim is good for its own sake, applies universally and is absolutely true in every situation.
The Categorical Imperative
Challenges to Kantian Ethics
Discourse Ethics - Habermas
Validity of a moral norm cannot be justified in the mind of an isolated individual reflecting on the world. Thus it must be justified through processes of communication, argumentation or discourse between individuals
Social Contract Theory
Individuals in a society live together to achieve mutual benefit and a quality of life that would not be achievable without cooperation. Individuals consent to the conditions and terms of social order, to the basic laws and sacrifice individual freedoms in exchange for the functioning of the society.
Rawl’s Theory
Asserts that the social contract ought to ensure the primacy of justice in all political, social, and economic agreements. The principles of justice are more important than the details and rules for setting up such institutions.
First Principle
Requires that each person has maximum basic liberties to the extent that they do not conflict with the liberties of others.
Second Principle
Inequalities are permitted in social and economic sphere but must be justified in the following ways.
o Difference Principle: All individuals must be better off despite the inequalities than they would be if all things were equal.
o The second part argues for equality of opportunity, not only for offices and positions, but also for acquiring necessary skills to be qualified.
Challenges to Social Contract Approach
Virtue Ethics
Ancient approach – based on certain “idea virtues” that provide for full development of our humanity and highest potential of character. These virtues included: honesty, courage, compassion, generosity, love etc.
Confucianism
Ethics of Care
Straw Man Fallacy
An argument in which the arguer criticizes a weakened or distorted version of his or her opponent’s point of view rather than dealing directly with that point of view.
Ad Hominem Fallacy
An argument that focuses on criticizing a person, rather than focusing on the strength of that person’s reasoning.
Argument from Tradition
An argument that argues that we should believe or do something simply because some group we belong to has believed or don that thing for a long time.
Argument from Popularity
An argument that argues we should believe or do something simply because believing it or doing it is popular.