A definition of corporate governance and the four general principles:
The system by which companies are directed and controlled. Boards of directors are responsible for the governance of their companies.
The four general principles are: , Fairness, Accountability, Responsibility and Transparency.
Agency Theory:
A theory (developed by Jensen & Meckling, 1976) that concerns the separation of ownership and control between owners and managers and the conflicts that arise given the differences between their interests. As managers, directors act as agents for the shareholders (principals).
Agency conflicts and agency costs arise because of these differences. The intention, through an “agency contract” is to align the interests of owners and managers.
A stakeholder is any group or individual who can affect or be affected by the achievement of the organisation’s objectives.
The different theoretical shareholder/stakeholder frameworks (approaches) to corporate governance. are:
Which one(s) best represent the approach in the UK is:
In the UK, it could be argued that shareholder value had been the most representative of the approach taken historically, with the trend moving towards stakeholder approach.
On the introduction of the Companies Act 2006, and specifically section 172 setting out the directors’ duty to ‘promote the success of the company ….. having regard to other factors’ (which includes other stakeholders), the enlightened share holder approach is now more representative.
The main differences between corporate governance approaches in the UK, USA and South Africa is that:
In the UK and South Africa the corporate governance codes are voluntary and are based on a “comply or explain” and “apply and explain” approach respectively. In the US, the approach to corporate governance is under the Sarbanes Oxley Act 2002 which is rules based and a legal requirement.
In terms of frameworks, corporate governance in the UK takes the enlightened stakeholder approach whereas in South Africa the King Code IV is based on the integrated approach.
There is much evidence that well-governed organisations perform better, showing that the adoption of good governance practices lead to:
The main issues in corporate governance where a conflict of interest might arise:
The above were the main areas of conflict cited in the ICSA’s suggested answer to Q2(a) of the November 2018 examination:
“Discuss the key issues in corporate governance where a conflict of ownership and control might be apparent. (15 marks)”
So, if you listed the main issues – great start! Could you discuss them?
Consequences can include:
The section of the Companies Act 2006 that is linked directly to the stakeholder approach of corporate governance is
Section 172 in which directors have a duty to “promote the success of the company for the benefit of its members as a whole and in doing so have regard (amongst other matters) to:
(a) the likely consequences of any decision in the long term,
(b) the interests of the company’s employees,
(c) the need to foster the company’s business relationships with suppliers, customers and others,
(d) the impact of the company’s operations on the community and the environment,
(e) the desirability of the company maintaining a reputation for high standards of business conduct, and
(f) the need to act fairly as between members of the company.”
The FRC Guidance on Board Effectiveness states, in general, the role of the company secretary:
Paragraph 79 states that the company secretary is responsible for
The company secretary can be described as ‘the conscience of the company’ in the context of business ethics and corporate governance. Acting in accordance with conscience means acting in a way that seems ethical.
In order to do so, the company secretary must be independent-minded and should not be under the influence of any other individual such as the company chairman or CEO.
The UK CG codes that refer to a company secretary:
Principle I. The board, supported by the company secretary, should ensure that it has the policies, processes, information, time and resources it needs in order to function effectively and efficiently
Provision 16. All directors should have access to the advice of the company secretary, who is responsible for advising the board on all governance matters. Both the appointment and removal of the company secretary should be a matter for the whole board.
Provision 17. The board should establish a nomination committee to lead the process for appointments, ensure plans are in place for orderly succession to both the board and senior management* positions, and oversee the development of a diverse pipeline for succession[…]
King Code IV (2016), South Africa – apply and explain, principles based (as in the UK), CSR is a key element
Sarbanes-Oxley Act 2002, USA – legal requirement, law based in contrast to the UK,
The seven Nolan Principles of public life are:
The Charities Code, published in 2017 (and refreshed in 2020)
Main principles:
The Code also explains the role of a trustee in a charitable context.
the main codes that companies listed on AIM can adopt are as follows:
Note: There is no definitive list of recognised codes from the LSE; however, it has highlighted the UK Corporate Governance Code and the Quoted Companies Alliance Guidelines as established benchmarks.
The six G20/OECD Principles of Corporate Governance
1, Ensuring the basis for an effective corporate governance framework
The International Corporate Governance Network, consists of investors, companies, financial intermediaries and academics. Its aims to promote international dialogue and best practice internationally in corporate governance. Published its own Global Governance Principles (last published in 2017), which its members are encouraged to promote in the countries in which they invest.
One-tier is where there is a board of directors, made up of executive and non-executive directors, as used in the UK, Netherlands and Scandinavia.
A two-tier system is where there is a management board of executive managers, chaired by the CEO and a supervisory board of non-executives which has oversight of the management board. These are used in Germany and China
The corporate governance frameworks in the Netherlands, and why these are adopted:
The governance framework accommodates both one and two-tier models.
The two-tier model is followed by the majority of Dutch listed companies. The one-tier model is used by Anglo-Dutch companies, such as Unilever and Shell, where their listings in the UK and US require it.
Chapter 5 of the Dutch Corporate Governance Code applies specifically to one-tier board companies, with the rest of the code focussing on two-tier companies.