Charged with theft.
a person who dishonestly appropriates property belonging to another with the intention to permanently deprive the other of it is guilty of theft.
Appropriation.
S3 TA 1968 states appropriation means to assume the rights of the owner, R v Morris.
Apply: D assumes the owners rights by
Issues with consent by deception, R v Gomez.
Grifts from vulnerable, R v Hinks
When appropriation occurs, R v Morris
S4 of TA 1968.
Apply: is property real, personal, intangible or thing in action.
Issues with wild property?
Issues with property as information, Oxford v Moss.
Real property - plants, anything attracted to the land etc.
S5 - the property must belong to another.
S5 states that this means if anyone has possession, control or proprietary interest in the property.
APPLY
If relevant:
- Control of another, R v Turner.
- Lost or abandoned, Williams v Phelps/ R v Woodman.
- Under and obligation - Davidge v Burnett (5.3).
- Recieved by mistake - AG 1 (5.4).
That D must be found to have acted dishonestly.
S2(1a-c) of TA details 3 circumstances where D is not dishonest - if they don’t apply: D doesn’t believe he has the right in law to…. And he doesn’t believe he has the consent of the owner. D doesn’t believe the owner cant be found by taking reasonable steps.
If one applies state why it does.
The judiciary apply the test confirmed in R v Barton and Booth - was D’s conduct dishonest according to the standards of an honest and ordinary person?
Treat the thing as heir own regardless of the owners rights.
Does borrowing or lending apply - consider whether some or all of the goodness or virtue have gone, R v Lloyd/ DPP v J.
Guilty of theft.