Define crime
An act committed in violation of the law where the individual receives some form of punishment from the state. It’s an act which is harmful for the individual, group or society as a whole
Define offender profiling
A behavioural and analytical tool to help investigators profile characteristics of unknown criminals
Define the top-down approach
Focusing on there big picture (large, wide-ranging factors) and use that to make predictions using a pre-existing template
When and where did the top-down approach originate?
In the 1970s in the US
How many interviews was it developed from and who was interviewed?
36 sexually motivated serial killers eg. Ted Bundy
What does modus operandi mean and why is it important for the top-down approach?
A signature way of working. The top-down approach works on the assumption that serious offenders have a modus operandi
Give key characteristics of an organised offender
-Planned and controlled approach
-Weapon brought to the scene
-Evidence destroyed or removed
-Victim is deliberately targeted as they have a type
-Offender usually unknown to victim
-Socially and sexually competent
-Normal/high intelligence
-Skilled and professional occupation
-Angry/depressed
-Usually married with children
Give key characteristics of an unorganised offender
-Unplanned, chaotic and spontaneous approach
-Weapons improvised
-Body often left at scene with lots of evidence
-Offender possibly known to victim
-Low intelligence
-Socially and sexually inept
-Anxious/psychotic
-Unskilled work/unemployed
-Live alone
Describe the 4 stages involved in FBI profile construction
How is the fact that it’s only useful for certain crimes a limitation of the top-down approach?
Only useful for crimes with unique characteristics such as rape and murder, so it cannot help for most common offences meaning it is a limited approach
How is it a limitation that there were issues with sample?
Typological approach developed from interviews of 36 killers. This is a very small and unrepresentative sample of self-report meaning we cannot generalise and may lack validity
How is it a strength that it has supportive evidence?
Canter et al conducted the smallest space analysis; a technique to analyse 100 USA murders in reference to 39 organised/disorganised characteristics. They found evidence of a distinct category of offender (organised)
How is it a strength that it is still widespread?
It has been used to identify serious offenders effectively