a duty of care is generally owed to
a child is required to conform to a higher standard of care than that of a child of like age, education, intelligence, and experience when the child engages in..
an activity that is normally one in which only adults engage
what must be shown by P under the attractive nuisance doctrine
under traditional liability rules… a landowner owes a duty to warn of or make safe known dangerous conditions on the land of which the licensee is…
NOT aware
under traditional liability for landowners, a landowner owes an invitee…
general duty to use reasonable and ordinary care in keeping the property reasonably safe for the benefit of the invitee AND duty to make reasonable inspections to discover dangerous conditions and make them safe
when can a person lose his invitee status
if he exceeds the scope of the invitation (goes into a portion of the premises where his invitation cannot reasonably be said to extend)
firefighter’s rule
police officers and firefighters are treated like licensees
and cannot recover for landowner’s failure to inspect or repair dangerous conditions that are an inherent risk of their law enforcement or firefighting activity
negligence per se
a bystander who witnesses the ∆ negligently injuring another can recover for NIED in most states by showing…
one who acts for the benefit of another has a duty to…
continue the assistance
transferred intent doctrine applies to
transferred intent doctrine
allows an intent to commit a tort against one person to be transferred to the committed tort or the injured person
shopkeeper’s privilege
IIED requires proof of
difference between trespass to chattels and conversion
seriousness of the interference with the P’s possession
when may a person use deadly force in self defense
if she reasonably believes she is in danger of serious bodily injury
to assert the defense of property, a ∆ using force against another may not…
use force against one with a privilege to enter the property
the “but for” test for actual cause applies to…
concurrent causes
eggshell-skull P rule
- unforeseeable severity of the P’s harm does not relieve the ∆ of liability
in a negligence action, the P cannot recover ___ damages
presumed
partial comparative negligence jurisdiction
P’s recovery will be barred if her negligence passes a threshold level, either 50% or 51%
for assumption of risk to be available as a defense, P must have
known of the risk and voluntarily assumed it
for a design defect in a products liability action, P must show…
a less dangerous modification or alternative for the product was economically feasible
to prove breach of duty in products liability action based on negligence, P must show…
∆ supplied a defective product