Make sure to go back to cosmetics
Know GCS, and that we use best response, left vs right .
Know classes of hemorrhagic shock
Head Injury classification GCS
Severe Head Injury/Coma – GCS score of 8 or
*
*
*
less.
Moderate Head Injury – GCS score of 9–12.
Mild Head Injury – GCS score of 13–15.
Denotation of T after the score is applied to an
intubated patient.
Zones of the neck
Zone 1 – thoracic inlet to cricoid cartilage.
*
Zone 2 – cricoid cartilage to angle of the
mandible.
*
Zone 3 – angle of the mandible to the base of
the skull.
What is the ideal line of osteosysnthesis of the mandible
A line around the mandible where plating the
tension and compression forces are balanced,
Pros and cons of locking plates and screws, non locking too
Locking plates/screws:
– Screws lock into the plate while it is being
–
tightened.
– Does not require a perfect adaptation of the
–
plate to the bone.
– The plate bears the load of mechanical
–
forces.
Plates named after the out dimeter of the screw.
What is primary bone healing
No fracture callus forms.
–
– Heals by a process of:
–
(a) Haversian remodeling directly across
the fracture site if no gap exists (con-
tact healing)
(b) Deposition of lamellar bBony callus forms across fracture site to
–
aid in stability and immobilization.
– Occurs when there is mobility around the
–
fracture site.
– Secondary bone healing involves the for-
–
mation of a subperiosteal hematoma, gran-
ulation tissue, and then a thin layer of bone
forms by membranous ossification. Hyaline
cartilage is deposited, replaced by woven
bone and remodels into mature lamellar
bone.
What is the process of secondary bone healing.
Bony callus forms across fracture site to
–
aid in stability and immobilization.
– Occurs when there is mobility around the
–
fracture site.
– Secondary bone healing involves the for-
–
mation of a subperiosteal hematoma, gran-
ulation tissue, and then a thin layer of bone
forms by membranous ossification. Hyaline
cartilage is deposited, replaced by woven
bone and remodels into mature lamellar
bone.
What is in a physical exam
After confirming the patient is stable and the
airway secure, begin the head and neck
trauma exam. This should be systematic and
concise.
Evaluate general demeanor and responsive-
ness. Patient cooperation may be extremely
difficult with pediatric or inebriated patients.
Evaluate neurological status to determine the
level of consciousness (Glasgow scale).
Evaluate for facial asymmetry, lacerations
(rule out Stenson duct or facial nerve injury),
edema and ecchymosis.
Examine the cranial nerves II–XII and note
any paresthesia (V1, V2, V3), or facial nerve
deficits.
If the orbit is involved, evaluate extra ocular
movements, pupillary reaction, direct and
consensual visual reflexes, monocular (indica-
tive of retinal detachment) or binocular diplo-
pia (can be secondary to edema or entrapment
and restriction of gaze), Tonometry should be
used for evaluating intraocular pressure. A
fundoscopic exam is indicated for for evaluat-
ing the retina and optic nerve, and hyphema.
A slit lamp exam is useful in evaluating the
*
*
*
*
eyelids, lacrimal system, cornea and to rule
out the presence of foreign bodies. Exam
should assess for the presence of proptosis,
dystopia (disturbance in globe position in the
vertical and horizontal planes) or enophthal-
mos. Look for periorbital ecchymosis (Racoon
eyes). Evaluate for telecanthus. Consider oph-
thalmology exam/clearance.
Evaluate the ears for the presence of ecchy-
mosis behind the ears (Battle’s sign) or otor-
rhea, which may be indicative of a base of
skull fracture (if positive neurosurgical con-
sultation is required). Rinne and Weber exam
to screen for hearing. Otoscopic exam to eval-
uate tympanic membrane and EAC (if injury
apparent ENT should be consulted).
Evaluate for exit wounds if a projectile was
involved.
Evaluate the midface for loss of projection,
edema, ecchymosis, and step deformities.
Evaluate the nose for asymmetries, blood, rhi-
norrhea, and septal hematoma.
Evaluate jaws for range deviations on opening
(this may indicate a condylar or subcondylar
fracture), arch step deformities, lingual ecchy-
mosis (highly indicative of a mandible frac-
ture), hematomas, and intraoral lacerations.
Evaluate the state of the dentition (dental frac-
tures, missing teeth, changes in occlusion).
For a pediatric patient correlate dental devel-
opment with chronological age.
Evaluate for a chin laceration, preauricular
edema, or ecchymosis as these can be sugges-
tive of a condylar fracture.
The floor of mouth swelling or the possibility
of airway compromise should be noted.
What radiographs for those with missing teeth.
abdominal X-ray
(KUB) and chest X-ray must be performed.
What fracture gives you anterior open binte? unilateral open bite? posterior crossbiet? prognathic bite? Retrognathic bite?
Anterior open bite – bilateral condylar or
–
angle fractures.
– Unilateral open bite – ipsilateral angle,
–
condylar and parasymphyseal fractures.
– Posterior crossbite – symphyseal and con-
–
dylar fractures with splaying of the poste-
rior segments.
– Prognathic bite – TMJ effusions.
–
– Retrognathic bite – condylar or angle
–
fractures
contraindications for closed reduction
Medical conditions that should avoid inter-
–
maxillary fixation.
– Alcoholics.
–
– Seizure disorders.
–
– Mental retardation.
–
– Nutritional concerns.
–
– Respiratory diseases (COPD).
–
– Unfavorable fractures.
–
Techniques for Closed Reduction:
Erich arch bars.
*
Ivy loops.
*
Essig Wire.
*
Intermaxillary fixation screws.
*
Splints.
*
Bridal wires.
Indications and contraindications for Open Reduction
Unfavorable/unstable mandibular
–
fractures.
– Patients with multiple facial fractures that
–
require a stable mandible for basing
reconstruction.
– Fractures of an edentulous mandible frac-
–
ture with severe displacement.
– Edentulous maxillary arch with opposing
–
mandible fracture
If a simpler method of repair is available,
maybe better to proceed with those options.
*
Severely comminuted fractures.
*
Patients with healing problems (radiation,
chronic steroid use, transplant patients).
*
Mandible fractures that are grossly infected.
Biomechanical difference of the edentulous mandible and biological differences
Decreased bone height leads to a decreased
–
buttressing effect (alters plate selection).
Significant bony resorption in the body
–
region.
– Significant effect of muscular pull, espe-
–
cially the digastric muscles.
– Incidence of fractures highest in the body.
–
– Atrophy creates saddle defects in the
–
body.
Biological differences:
– Decreased inferior alveolar artery (centrif-
–
ugal) blood flow.
– Dependent on periosteal (centripetal) blood
–
flow.
– Medical conditions that delay healing.
–
– Decreased ability to heal with age.
–
How to do closed reduction of the edentulous patient, how about open reduction
Closed Reduction.
– Use of circummandibular wires fixated to
–
the piriform rims and circumzygomatic
wires with patient’s denture or Gunning
style splints.
Wassmund scheme of condylar process fractures
I – minimal displacement of the head
–
(10–45°). II – fracture with tearing of medial joint
–
capsule (45–90°), bone still contacting.
– III – bone fragments not contacting, condy-
–
lar head outside of capsule medially and
anteriorly displaced.
– IV – head is anterior to the articular
–
eminence.
– V – vertical or oblique fractures through
–
the condylar head.
OPen Reduction of condylar fractions, Zides absolute indications.
(1) Middle cranial fossa involvement with
disability.
(2) Inability to achieve occlusion with
closed reduction.
(3) Invasion of joint space by a foreign
body.
(4) Lateral capsule violation and
displacement.
ide’s Relative Indications:
–
(1) Bilateral condylar fractures where the
vertical facial height needs to be restored.
(2) Associated injuries that dictate early or
immediate function.
(3) Medical conditions that indicate open
procedures.
(4) Delayed treatment with misalignment
of segments.
What are the indications for removal of teeth in the line of fracture.
*
*
Gross mobility.
Periapical pathology.
Preventing reduction.
Roots with a fracture.*
*
Exposed root.
Delay in repair from time of fracture.
Recurrent infection at the fracture site despite
antibiotic therapy.
What is Non union
Arrested healing after the appro-
priate time has passed (mobility after 4 weeks
without treatment and 8 weeks with surgical
management). Can be multifactorial but includes
mobility at the fracture site, poor reduction,
infection, substance abuse, delay in treatment, or
tooth in line of fracture.
what is osteomyelitis and how to diagnose it.
Osteomyelitis – Complaint of continued pain,
paresthesia, feeling of the mobility of plate.
Diagnosis can be made with labeled white blood
cell scans (indium-111), bone scans (technetium
99), MRI, or biopsy of bone.
Treatment can
involve removal of hardware with closed
reduction, resection/debridement/cortication of
bone, placement of rigid fixation, IV antibiotics,
and consideration of hyperbaric oxygen therapy.
Describe the 3 left fractures
LeFort I (Horizontal Fracture) – extends above
the apices of the maxillary dentition across the
nasal septum and maxillary sinuses. Posteriorly itextends through the pyramidal process of the
palatine bone and the pterygoid processes of the
sphenoid bone. It also may involve the fracture of
the palate.
LeFort II (Pyramidal Fracture) – extends from
the nasofrontal region down through the medial
orbital wall, crossing the inferior orbital rim and
zygomatic buttresses. Posteriorly similar to a
LeFort I fracture.
LeFort III (Complete Craniofacial
Disjunction) – fracture lines extend through the
nasofrontal junctions, zygomaticofrontal articu-
lations, zygomaticomaxillary suture, temporozy-
gomatic suture, pterygomaxillary junction,
medial and lateral orbital walls, and superior
articulation of the nasal septum.