Trinity Flashcards

(57 cards)

1
Q

What is the origin of the Trinity doctrine?
The New Encyclopedia Britannica says:

A

“Neither the word Trinity, nor the explicit doctrine as such, appears in the New Testament, nor did Jesus and his followers intend to contradict the Shema in the Old testament: ‘Hear, O Israel: The Lord (Jehovah) our God is one Lord (Jehovah)’ (Deut. 6:4)…. The doctrine developed gradually over several centuries and through many controversies…. By the end of the 4th century.. the doctrine of the Trinity took substantially the form it has maintained ever since.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Quote Deuteronomy 6:4

A

“Listen, O Israel: Jehovah our God is one Jehovah.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the origin of the Trinity doctrine?
The New Catholic Encyclopedia states:

A

“The formulation ‘one God in three Persons’ was not solidly established, certainly not fully assimilated into Christian life and its profession of faith, prior to the end of the 4th century. But it is precisely this formulation that has first claim to the title “the Trinitarian dogma”. Among the Apostolic Fathers, there had been nothing even remotely approaching such a mentality or perspective.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is the origin of the Trinity doctrine?
The Encyclopedia Americana states:

A

“Christianity derived from Judaism and Judaism was strictly Unitarian [believing that God is one person]. The road which led from Jerusalem to Nicea was scarcely a straight one. Fourth century Trinitarianism did not reflect accurately early Christian teaching regarding the nature of God; it was, on the contrary, a deviation from this teaching.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

What is the origin of the Trinity doctrine?
The Nouveau Dictionnaire Universel states:

A

“The Platonic trinity, itself merely a rearrangement of older trinities dating back to earlier peoples, appears to be the rational philosophic trinity of attributes that gave birth to the three hypostases or divine persons taught by the Christian churches…. This Greek philosopher’s [Plato, fourth century B.C.E.] conception of the divine trinity… can be found in all the ancient [pagan] religions.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

What is the origin of the Trinity doctrine?
John Mckenzie, in his book “Dictionary of the Bible”, says:

A

“The trinity of persons within the unity of nature is defined in terms of ‘person’ and ‘nature’ which are G[ree]k philosophical terms; actually the terms do not appear in the Bible. The trinitarian definitions arose as the result of long controversies in which these terms and others such as ‘essence’ and ‘substance’ were erroneously applied to God by some theologians.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

Does the Bible teach that the “Holy Spirit” is a person?

A

Some individual texts seem to refer to the holy spirit having a personality. But other texts say that people were “filled” with holy spirit, that some were ‘baptized’ with it or “anointed” with it. These latter references to holy spirit definitely do not fit a person. To understand what the Bible as a whole teaches, all these texts must be considered.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Does the Bible teach that the “Holy Spirit” is a person?
The New Catholic Encyclopedia admits:

A

“The majority of New Testament texts reveal God’s spirit as something, not someone; this is especially seen in the parallelism between the spirit and the power of God…. The Apologists [Greek Christian writers of the second century] spoke too haltingly of the Spirit; with a measure of anticipation, one might say too impersonally.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Does the Bible agree with those who teach that the Father and the Son are not separate and distinct individuals?
“Going a little farther he [Jesus] fell on his face and prayed, ‘My Father, if it be possible, let this cup pass from me; nevertheless, not as I will, but as thou wilt.”

A

Matthew 26:39
Jesus would have been praying to himself, and his will would of necessity have been the Father’s will.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Does the Bible agree with those who teach that the Father and the Son are not separate and distinct individuals?
“[Jesus answered the Jewish Pharisees:] In your law it is written that the testimony of two men is true; I bear witness to myself, and the Father who sent me bears witness to me.”

A

John 8: 17,18
Jesus definitely spoke of himself as being an individual separate and distinct from the Father.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Does the Bible teach that all who are said to be part of the Trinity are eternal, none having a beginning?
“He [Jesus Christ] is the image of the invisible God, the first-born of all creation; for in him all things were created, in heaven and one earth.”

A

Colossians 1:15,16
If the trinity doctrine is true, why are the Father and the holy spirit not also said to be the firstborn of all creation? But the Bible applies this expression only to the Son. According to the customary meaning of “firstborn,” it indicates that Jesus is the eldest in Jehovah’s family of sons.
The expression “the firstborn of” occurs upwards of 30 times in the Bible, and in each instance that it is applied to living creatures the same meaning applies -the firstborn is part of the group.
The correct rendering is “by means of Jesus all other things were created.” Jesus is thus shown to be a created being, part of the creation produced by God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Does the Bible teach that all who are said to be part of the Trinity are eternal, none having a beginning?
“And to the angel of the church in La-odicea write: “The words of the Amen (Jesus), the faithful and true witness, the beginning of God’s creation.” (Other translations, not just NW, read similarly.)

A

Revelation 3:14
Jesus is referred to as a creation, the first of God’s creation, that he had a beginning.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Does the Bible teach that all who are said to be part of the Trinity are eternal, none having a beginning?
“Jehovah produced me as the beginning of his way, The earliest of his achievements of long ago.”

A

Proverbs 8:22
Many bible commentators agree that the Son is referred to here as wisdom personified. According to some translations, the one here speaking is said to be “created”.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Does the Bible teach that all who are said to be part of the Trinity are eternal, none having a beginning?
“And you, O Bethlehem, Ephrathah, The one too little to be among the thousands of Judah, From you will come out for me the one to be ruler in Israel, Whose origin is from ancient times, from the days of long ago.”

A

Micah 5:2
Byington translation says: “….his origins being from of old, from ancient days.”
Rotherham translation says: “Whose comings forth have been from of old, from the days of age-past time.”

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Does the Bible teach that none of those who are said to be included in the Trinity is greater or less than another, that all are equal, that all are almighty?
“Of that day or that hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.”

A

Mark 13:32
This would not be the case if the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit were coequal, comprising one Godhead. And if, as some suggest, the Son was limited by his human nature from knowing, the question remains, Why did the Holy Spirit not know?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Does the Bible teach that none of those who are said to be included in the Trinity is greater or less than another, that all are equal, that all are almighty?
“The mother of the sons of Zebedee… said to him [Jesus], ‘Command that these two sons of mine may sit, one at your right hand and one at your left, in your Kingdom.’ But Jesus answered,… ‘You will drink my cup, but to sit at my right hand and at my left is not mine to grant, but it is for those for whom it has been prepared by my Father.”’

A

Matthew 20: 20-23
How strange, if, as claimed, Jesus is God! This shows that the Son is not equal to the Father, that the Father has reserved some prerogatives for himself?

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
17
Q

Does the Bible teach that none of those who are said to be included in the Trinity is greater or less than another, that all are equal, that all are almighty?
“Every sin and blasphemy will be forgiven men, but the blasphemy against the Spirit will not be forgiven. And whoever says a word against the Son of man will be forgiven; but whoever speaks against the Holy Spirit will not be forgiven, either in this age or in the age to come.”

A

Matthew 12:31,32
If the Holy Spirit were a person and were God, this text would flatly contradict the Trinity doctrine, because it would mean that in some way the Holy Spirit was greater than the Son. Instead, what Jesus said shows that the Father, to whom the “Spirit” belonged, is greater than Jesus, the Son of man.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
18
Q

Does the Bible teach that none of those who are said to be included in the Trinity is greater or less than another, that all are equal, that all are almighty?
“[Jesus said:] If you loved me, you would have rejoiced, because I go to the Father; for the Father is greater than I.”

A

John 14:28

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
19
Q

Does the Bible teach that none of those who are said to be included in the Trinity is greater or less than another, that all are equal, that all are almighty?
“I want you to understand that the head of a woman is her husband, and the head of Christ is God.”

A

1 Cor. 11:3
Clearly, then, Christ is not God, and God is of superior rank to Christ. It should be noted that this was written about 55 C.E., some 22 years after Jesus returned to heaven. So the truth here stated applies to the relationship between God and Christ in heaven.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
20
Q

Is the Son or the holy spirit ever referred to as “Almighty”?

A

The Hebrew word Shaddai and the Greek word Pantokrator are both translated “Almighty”. Both original-language words are repeatedly applied to Jehovah, the Father. Neither expression is ever applied to either the Son or the holy spirit.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
21
Q

Does the Bible teach that each of those said to be part of the Trinity is God?
“Jesus said in prayer: “Father,… this is eternal life, that they know thee the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom thou hast sent.”

A

John 17:1-3
Only the Father is here called “the only true God”. This cannot be the case if there are two others who are God to the same degree as he is. Any others referred to as “gods” must be either false or merely a reflection of the true God.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
22
Q

Does the Bible teach that each of those said to be part of the Trinity is God?
“Although there may be so-called gods in heaven or on earth- as indeed there are many ‘gods’ and many ‘lords’- yet for us there is one God, the Father, from whom are all things and for whom we exist, and one Lord, Jesus Christ, through whom are all things and through whom we exist.”

A

1 Cor. 8:5,6
This presents the Father as the “one God” of Christians and as being in a class distinct from Jesus Christ.

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
23
Q

Does the Bible teach that each of those said to be part of the Trinity is God?
“Blessed be the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ!”

A

1 Peter 1:3
Repeatedly, even following Jesus’ ascension to heaven, the Scriptures refer to the Father as “the God” of Jesus Christ. But never in the Bible is the Father reported to refer to the Son as “my God,” nor does either the Father or the Son refer to the holy spirit as “my God.”

24
Q

Does the Bible teach that each of those said to be part of the Trinity is God?
“I (Jesus) am ascending to my Father and your Father and to my God and your God.”

A

John 20:17
Jesus, after his resurrection, refers to the Father as “my God.” But never in the Bible is the Father reported to refer to the Son as “my God,” nor does either the Father or the Son refer to the holy spirit as “my God.”

25
Does the Bible teach that each of those said to be part of the Trinity is God? Karl Rahner, in his book "Theological Investigations", admits:
"[God] is still nver used of the Spirit" and ""the God" is never used in the New Testament to speak of the [holy spirit]."
26
Do any of the scriptures that are used by Trinitarians to support their belief provide a solid basis for that dogma?
A person who is really seeking to know the truth about God is not going to search the Bible hoping to find a text that he can construe as fitting what he already believes. He wants to know what God's Word itself says. Most of the "proof" texts actually mention only two persons, not three. This hardly proves the trinity.
27
Texts in which a title that belongs to Jehovah is applied to Jesus or is claimed to apply to Jesus. Alpha and Omega
Revelation 1:8. Rev. 21:6,7 indicates that anointed Christians are to be 'sons' of the Alpha and Omega. That is never said of the relationship of spirit-anointed Christians to Jesus Christ. Jesus spoke of them as his 'brothers'. But elsewhere those 'brother' of Jesus are referred to as "sons of God."
28
Texts in which a title that belongs to Jehovah is applied to Jesus or is claimed to apply to Jesus. "Savior" Both God and Jesus are referred to as Savior. So does that make them the same? Not at all. "God, our Savior through Jesus Christ our Lord."
Jude 25
29
Isaiah 43:10,11 says
"You are my witnesses," declares Jehovah, "Yes, my servant whom I have chosen, So that you may know and have faith in me And understand that I am the same One. Before me no God was formed, And after me there has been none. I- I am Jehovah, and besides me there is no Savior."
30
Since Jesus Christ is prophetically called "Mighty God" at Isaiah 9:6, Jesus must be Jehovah?
Jehovah himself caused someone (Jesus) to exist who is properly referred to as a god. Both Jehovah and Jesus are referred to as "Mighty God". But only Jehovah is ever call "God Almighty". If a certain tile or descriptive phrase if found in more than one location in the Scriptures, it should never hastily be concluded that it must always refer to the same person. We should always consider the context and any other instances in the bible where the same expression occurs.
31
"Remember the former things of long ago, That I am God, and there is no other. I am God, and there is no one like me. Form the beginning I foretell he outcome, And from long ago the things that have not yet been done. I say, 'My decision will stand, And I will do whatever I please."
Isaiah 46:9,10
32
Where is it that the Bible refers to men acting as judges as "gods"?
Psalms 82:1,6 "God takes his place in the divine assmebly; In the middle of the gods (godlike-ones) he judges... I have said, 'You are gods, All of you are sons of the Most High."
33
Why does John 1:23 quote Isaiah 40:3 and apply it to what John the Baptizer did in preparing the way for Jesus Christ, when Isiah 40:3 is clearly discussing preparing the way before Jehovah?
Because Jesus represented his Father. Jesus came in his Father's name.
34
Both Matthew 28:19 and 2 Corinthians 13:14 mention together the Father, the Son, and the Holy Spirit. Does this prove the trinity?
No. Neither of these texts says that Father, Son, and Holy Spirit are coequal or coeternal or that all are God. "These texts taken by themselves, would not prove decisively either the personality of the three subjects mentioned, or their equality or divinity. These texts are "insufficient" to prove the Trinity.
35
Did the ancient nation of Israel worship a triad of Gods?
No. The nation of Israel, to whom Deuteronomy 6:4 "Jehovah our God is one Jehovah" was stated, did not believe in the Trinity. The Babylonians and the Egyptians worshiped triads of gods, but it was made clear to Israel that Jehovah is different.
36
John 1:18 says:
“No one has ever seen God.” Verse 14 clearly says that “the Word became flesh and dwelt among us . . . we have beheld his glory.”
37
Hebrews 1:1-4 says:
"Long ago God spoke to our forefathers by means of the prophets on many occasions and in many ways.+ 2 Now at the end of these days he has spoken to us by means of a Son,+ whom he appointed heir of all things,+ and through whom he made the systems of things.+ 3 He is the reflection of God’s glory+ and the exact representation of his very being,+ and he sustains all things by the word of his power. And after he had made a purification for our sins,+ he sat down at the right hand of the Majesty on high.+ 4 So he has become better than the angels+ to the extent that he has inherited a name more excellent than theirs.+"
38
In his article “Qualitative Anarthrous Predicate Nouns: Mark 15:39 and John 1:1,” Philip B. Harner said that such clauses as the one in John 1:1,...
“with an anarthrous predicate preceding the verb, are primarily qualitative in meaning. They indicate that the logos has the nature of theos.” He suggests: “Perhaps the clause could be translated, ‘the Word had the same nature as God.’” (Journal of Biblical Literature, 1973, pp. 85, 87)
39
In John 1:1, the fact that the word the·osʹ in its second occurrence is without the definite article (ho) and is placed before the verb in the sentence in Greek is significant. Interestingly, translators that insist on rendering John 1:1, “The Word was God,” do not hesitate to do what?
use the indefinite article (a, an) in their rendering of other passages where a singular anarthrous predicate noun occurs before the verb. Thus at John 6:70, JB and KJ both refer to Judas Iscariot as “a devil,” and at John 9:17 they describe Jesus as “a prophet.”
40
John L. McKenzie, S.J., in his Dictionary of the Bible, says: “Jn 1:1 should rigorously be translated as what?
‘the word was with the God [= the Father], and the word was a divine being.’”
41
How have some other Bible translations translated John 1:1?
In harmony with the above, AT reads: “the Word was divine”; Mo, “the Logos was divine”; NTIV, “the word was a god.” In his German translation Ludwig Thimme expresses it in this way: “God of a sort the Word was.” Referring to the Word (who became Jesus Christ) as “a god” is consistent with the use of that term in the rest of the Scriptures. For example, at Psalm 82:1-6 human judges in Israel were referred to as “gods” (Hebrew, ’elo·himʹ; Greek, the·oiʹ, at John 10:34) because they were representatives of Jehovah and were to speak his law.
42
Which rendering of John 8:58 agrees with the context?
The question of the Jews (verse 57) to which Jesus was replying had to do with age, not identity. Jesus’ reply logically dealt with his age, the length of his existence. Interestingly, no effort is ever made to apply e·goʹ ei·miʹ as a title to the holy spirit.
43
John 8:58 says:
"Jesus said to them: “Most truly I say to you, before Abraham came into existence, I have been.”" Context shows Jesus was talking about his age, not his identity.
44
The New International Dictionary of New Testament Theology states what in regards to Rom. 9:5 "To them the forefathers belong,+ and from them the Christ descended according to the flesh.+ God, who is over all, be praised forever. Amen."?
That Romans 9:5 is disputed. . . . It would be easy, and linguistically perfectly possible to refer the expression to Christ. The verse would then read, ‘Christ who is God over all, blessed for ever. Amen.’ Even so, Christ would not be equated absolutely with God, but only described as a being of divine nature, for the word theos has no article. . . . The much more probable explanation is that the statement is a doxology directed to God.”—(Grand Rapids, Mich.; 1976), translated from German, Vol. 2, p. 80.
45
Philippians 2:5,6 says:
Keep this mental attitude in you that was also in Christ Jesus,+ 6 who, although he was existing in God’s form,+ did not even consider the idea of trying to be equal to God.+
46
Which translation gets Philippians 2:5,6 right and agrees with the context?
Verse 5 counsels Christians to imitate Christ in the matter here being discussed. Could they be urged to consider it “not robbery,” but their right, “to be equal with God”? Surely not! However, they can imitate one who “gave no consideration to a seizure, namely, that he should be equal to God.” (NW) (Compare Genesis 3:5.) Such a translation also agrees with Jesus Christ himself, who said: “The Father is greater than I.”—John 14:28.
47
What does "The Expositor’s Greek Testament" say about Philippians 2:5,6?
“We cannot find any passage where [har·paʹzo] or any of its derivatives [including har·pag·monʹ] has the sense of ‘holding in possession,’ ‘retaining’. It seems invariably to mean ‘seize,’ ‘snatch violently’. Thus it is not permissible to glide from the true sense ‘grasp at’ into one which is totally different, ‘hold fast.’”—(Grand Rapids, Mich.; 1967), edited by W. Robertson Nicoll, Vol. III, pp. 436, 437.
48
What does "Liddell and Scott's Greek=English Lexicon" say about the Greek word "theo'tes"?
"The·oʹtes (the nominative form, from which the·oʹte·tos is derived) means “divinity, divine nature.” (Oxford, 1968, p. 792) Being truly “divinity,” or of “divine nature,” does not make Jesus as the Son of God coequal and coeternal with the Father, any more than the fact that all humans share “humanity” or “human nature” makes them coequal or all the same age.
49
1 John 5:7, 8 says:
KJ reads: “For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth, the spirit, and the water, and the blood: and these three agree in one.” (Dy also includes this Trinitarian passage.) However, NW does not include the words “in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one. And there are three that bear witness in earth.” (RS, NE, TEV, JB, NAB also leave out the Trinitarian passage.)
50
Regarding the Trinitarian passage at 1 John 5:7,8, what does textual critic F. H. A. Scrivener wrote:
“We need not hesitate to declare our conviction that the disputed words were not written by St. John: that they were originally brought into Latin copies in Africa from the margin, where they had been placed as a pious and orthodox gloss on ver. 8: that from the Latin they crept into two or three late Greek codices, and thence into the printed Greek text, a place to which they had no rightful claim.”—A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament (Cambridge, 1883, third ed.), p. 654.
51
Says A. T. Robertson in Word Pictures in the New Testament: “Recall [John] 2:19 where Jesus said: ‘And in three days I will raise it up.’ He did not mean what?
that he will raise himself from the dead independently of the Father as the active agent (Rom. 8:11).”—(New York, 1932), Vol. V, p. 183. By his perfect obedience as a human, Jesus provided the moral basis for the Father to raise him from the dead, thus acknowledging Jesus as God’s Son. Because of Jesus’ faithful course of life, it could properly be said that Jesus himself was responsible for his resurrection.
52
When saying, “I and the Father are one,” (John 10:30) did Jesus mean that they were equal?
Some Trinitarians say that he did. But at John 17:21, 22, Jesus prayed regarding his followers: “That they may all be one,” and he added, “that they may be one even as we are one.” He used the same Greek word (hen) for “one” in all these instances. Obviously, Jesus’ disciples do not all become part of the Trinity. But they do come to share a oneness of purpose with the Father and the Son, the same sort of oneness that unites God and Christ.
53
In what position does belief in the Trinity put those who cling to it?
It puts them in a very dangerous position. The evidence is indisputable that the dogma of the Trinity is not found in the Bible, nor is it in harmony with what the Bible teaches. (See the preceding pages.) It grossly misrepresents the true God. Yet, Jesus Christ said: “The hour is coming, and now is, when the true worshipers will worship the Father in spirit and truth, for such the Father seeks to worship him. God is spirit, and those who worship him must worship in spirit and truth.” (John 4:23, 24, RS) Thus Jesus made it clear that those whose worship is not ‘in truth,’ not in harmony with the truth set out in God’s own Word, are not “true worshipers.” To Jewish religious leaders of the first century, Jesus said: “For the sake of your tradition, you have made void the word of God. You hypocrites! Well did Isaiah prophesy of you, when he said: ‘This people honors me with their lips, but their heart is far from me; in vain do they worship me, teaching as doctrines the precepts of men.’” (Matt. 15:6-9, RS) That applies with equal force to those in Christendom today who advocate human traditions in preference to the clear truths of the Bible.
54
What can you say when someone says— ‘Do you believe in the Trinity?’
You might reply: ‘That is a very popular belief in our time. But did you know that this is not what was taught by Jesus and his disciples? So, we worship the One that Jesus said to worship.’ Then perhaps add: (1) ‘When Jesus was teaching, here is the commandment that he said was greatest . . . (Mark 12:28-30).’ (2) ‘Jesus never claimed to be equal to God. He said . . . (John 14:28).’ (3) ‘Then what is the origin of the Trinity doctrine? Notice what well-known encyclopedias say about that. (See pages 405, 406.)’
55
What can you say when someone says— ‘Do you believe in the Trinity?’
An additional suggestion: ‘I find that not everyone has the same thing in mind when he refers to the Trinity. Perhaps I could answer your question better if I knew what you mean.’ Then perhaps add: ‘I appreciate that explanation. But what I believe is only what the Bible teaches. Have you ever seen the word “Trinity” in the Bible? . . . (Refer to the concordance in your Bible.) But is Christ referred to in the Bible? . . . Yes, and we believe in him. Notice here in the concordance under “Christ” one of the references is to Matthew 16:16. (Read it.) That is what I believe.’
56
What can you say when someone says— ‘Do you believe in the Trinity?’
Or you might answer (if the person draws particular attention to John 1:1): ‘I am acquainted with that verse. In some Bible translations it says that Jesus is “God,” and others say that he is “a god.” Why is that?’ (1) ‘Could it be because the next verse says that he was “with God”?’ (2) ‘Might it also be because of what is found here in John 1:18?’ (3) ‘Have you ever wondered whether Jesus himself worships someone as God? (John 20:17)’
57
What can you say when someone says— ‘Do you believe in the divinity of Christ?’
You might reply: ‘Yes, I certainly do. But perhaps I do not have in mind the same thing that you do when you refer to “the divinity of Christ.”’ Then perhaps add: (1) ‘Why do I say that? Well, at Isaiah 9:6 Jesus Christ is described as “Mighty God,” but only his Father is ever referred to in the Bible as the Almighty God.’ (2) ‘And notice that at John 17:3 Jesus speaks of his Father as “the only true God.” So, at most, Jesus is just a reflection of the true God.’ (3) ‘What is required on our part to be pleasing to God? (John 4:23, 24)’