If the executors of an estate don’t have enough cash to pay the IHT bill, can they release the estate.
No, If they don’t have enough cash to pay the IHT bill, they can’t release the estate.
Sometimes this can leave trustees having to take out a short term loan to fund the IHT.
They then use funds in the estate to repay the loan.
Having funds available within a trust, provides access to funds to pay any IHT bill as well as other costs that occur in obtaining probate and settling someone’s affairs on death.
Give some examples of where the annual exemption can be used to help mitigate tax
The use of this year’s annual exemption, and last years if it hasn’t yet been used, is a great way to gift away some money.
This can be used as the first part of a larger gift, or even to make contributions to life policies, or pensions. As we saw in the snapshot of the tax tables, special allowances on marriage, and gifts to charities, are other ways to enable a reduction in the estate value.
One point that we made in the last chapter was that regular gifts out of income need to actually be out of real income, and not a withdrawal of capital, such as use of the 5% withdrawals from investment bonds.
For those with a good disposable income, there is much that can be done to minimise the eventual IHT liability, or to fund life cover plans to meet liabilities.
With so many options available, there are some key choices to make regarding when transfers are made, both during the settlor’s lifetime and on death. We need to consider the needs of the settlor, their immediate family and dependents, and their eventual beneficiaries.
One of the first choices to make when looking at making transfers out of an estate, is whether to do this during lifetime, or whether it is best to wait until death.
What are the benefits and drawbacks of gifting assets while you are alive?
Can be good for IHT, as the 7 year rule means that the transfer falls out of the estate for IHT purposes.
May also effect financial security during life by reducing available funds / assets
It could be that income is needed from capital during lifetime, although there are packaged plans that can assist with this.
CGT holdover relief can be obtained on transfer into a trust, but this only defers the payment of tax until a future date / a different payer
Trusts allow control
No limits on transfers into bare trusts as not a relevant property trust. After 7 years outside of the estate, however, control will be lost
One of the first choices to make when looking at making transfers out of an estate, is whether to do this during lifetime, or whether it is best to wait until death.
What are the benefits and drawbacks of gifting assets until death?
CGT on death is eliminated, so a large gain may best be left until death
Business relief can provide 100% exemption on death, however legislation may change in the future and holdings shares until death may not be commercially desirable.
Business assets, especially in a small family business, may be high risk and have low liquidity.
Spousal exemptions are available and unlimited if both UK domiciled.
The estate value may be below the available NRBs especially as transferability may be available as well as the use of trusts.
Give some positive examples of using a Bare Trust
There is no limit to the amount that can be transferred
Transfers into bare trusts are PETs and are not in the relevant property regime
There is no lifetime IHT when setup
After 7 years, the transfer will no longer impact the settlors estate.
If the settlor dies within 7 years, and the gift is more than the NRB, there may be tapering of the tax due
Once gifted, any growth on the assets is outside of the estate
Give some negative examples of using a bare Trust
There are CGT consequences for the transfer
If transferred to a spouse, this would be on a no loss no gain basis, to anyone else it is a CGT disposal
To protect the beneficiaries from an unwelcome IHT bill on the settlors death, a gift inter vivos policy may be required.
The gift is an outright gift, so control is lost
if the PET fails, it will be inside the beneficiaries estate, so may use up part of any NRB available.
Name some positive of using a DT trust (CLTs)
Popular IHT planning mechanism for transfers up to the available NRB
Good to remove assets from the estate, with flexibility over the choice of beneficiaries.
Any capital appreciation is not chargeable on the donor, so good for those assets most likely to appreciate in value.
CGT holdover relief is available
Name some negatives of using a DT trust (CLTs)
Any amount over the available NRB will be subject to lifetime IHT at 20% where the trustee pays, or 25% where the settlor pays.
Capital is given away and cant be used for other purposes.
Subject to periodic and exit charges over the available NRB.
Ziva created a DT two years ago for the benefit of her husband, children and grandchildren. Following the sale of her business, she is considering adding to the trust with some or all of the proceeds.
Explain 8 factors that Ziva should take into account before making further gifts into the DT
Does the trust allow additional gifts to be made?
What are the tax implications of of new money going into and exiting the trust?
The purpose of the trust? what is laid out in the trust deed?
The investment strategy of the trust and current market conditions
The circumstances of the current beneficiaries. Are there any new beneficiaries that should be included, two years on since the trust was originally setup.
Can Ziva afford to make the gift? has she considered the level of capital or income she needs following the sale of the business?
Whether a different trust may have been more appropriate. Business relief scheme would likely be more tax efficient, however comes with additional risks.
Would Ziva consider a outright gift to her beneficiaries rather than a trust
Has she maximised her pension previsions or could this be enhanced
Is there a correct order when making both PETs and CLTs to gift assets to beneficiaries?
If both PETs and CLTs are being used to gift assets to beneficiaries, the order they are given in has an impact on the amount of IHT paid.
Unfortunately, there is not an ‘always right’ order. It will depend on the amounts involved, and how long a donor lives after the gift is given. The donor’s health at the time of the gift will also be a consideration.
Why would you look to use a DT first when looking to make a series of gifts
As we have mentioned, when giving money out of the estate, the first part of the gift may be covered by the annual exemption.
o If more than one gift is given in the same tax year, it will be the first gift chronologically that will benefit from the exemption.
If the first gift were a PET, and the donor survives for seven years, then using an exemption is effectively wasted.
o The whole gift would never have been chargeable.
o This may be a reason for making the CLT first, as the exemption will reduce the chargeable amount.
A CLT will be subject to the relevant property rules around periodic charging.
o Making a CLT before a PET minimises the tax payable at the 10-year point.
A CLT will be subject to the relevant property rules around periodic charging. Making a CLT before a PET minimises the tax payable at the 10-year point.
This is because?
when the 10-year point is reached, the amount of available nil rate band is relevant, and the nil rate band would consider any CLTs or failed PETs in the 7 years prior to the gift
If the donor had died, then the failed PET would impact, however if the failed PET was after the CLT then this wouldn’t affect the 10-year periodic charge
Just to confuse matters, let’s consider a situation where the amount of IHT would be higher if the CLT was made first!
On the settlor’s death, the IHT on a later now-failed PET would have to consider any CLTs in the 7 years prior to the date of the PET, even if this was more than 7 years from the donor’s death.
Why would we need to look at the 7 years prior to a failed PET?
There is only one real way to avoid the situation of one gift affecting another, and that is to ensure that there is more than 7 years left between each gift.
For that reason, the earlier IHT planning can take place, the better This can help give the maximum number of 7-year periods before death
Checking back 14 years will ensure of any used NRB
Can trusts be setup on the same day by the same settlor
Trusts set up on the same day by the same settlor cant be set up on the same day
Trusts setup on the same day would be known as related settlements
HMRC will deem that they are in fact the same trust, and add them all together for the purpose of IHT.
This would effectively just give them one NRB
The inheritance tax Act 1984, (IHTA) deemed that whilst each trust has its own NRB the calculation of tax rate has to take into account the value of any other trusts made on the same day
If Marco set up 4 trust on the same day for £100,000 each, would the related settlement rules apply?
Yes, this would mean that the four trusts would be added together for the purpose of calculating lifetime IHT on entry and the 10 ear periodic charge.
Applying the standard NRB of £325,000 to the initial £400,000 would mean that £75,000 would be chargeable at 20%.
Therefore, £15,000 lifetime IHT would be paid on entry into the trusts
Under the Trustee Act, trustees have wide powers of investments.
What investments can they invest in?
Under the Trustee Act, trustees have wide powers of investments. They can theoretically invest in investment bonds, collective investments, or directly into any of the asset classes, as long as they consider diversification and the needs of the trust.
Why are investment bonds are often a preferred choice for trustee investments.
One factor that drives this is simplicity of the taxation of investment bonds within the trust. Trusts are only assessed for income tax when a chargeable event occurs on the investment bond, and investment bonds do not have any CGT implications.
The administration and tax reporting are kept simple, which in turn keeps costs down. This can be less important for large or professionally managed trusts, but for lay trustees it is an important consideration.
The fact that bonds can be assigned both in to and out of trust without triggering a chargeable gain / income tax liability, gives great flexibility to the provision of benefits.
The benefit of the 5% withdrawal rules to create an ‘income’ stream is central to the workings of IHT packaged products.
For simplicity in this guide, we have already referred (quite a few times) to taking an ‘income’ of 5% from an investment bond.
Name some other investment considerations that must be factored when choosing a trust
The settlor’s and beneficiaries entitlement to the trust
The type of trust, e.g bare, IIP, discretionary
The ages of the beneficiaries, long term investments may not be suitable in a bare trust for 17 years old’s
The trust management and other expenses
The need for capital or income
*setting up complex arrangements for a small trust scheme will likely not be cost effective, and would go against the trustees’ duties to look after the trust assets for the benefit of the beneficiaries
What is a Discounted Gift Trust
A discounted gift trust (DGT) is a special kind of trust arrangement that allows an individual to give away a lump sum of money into trust for the ultimate benefit of their beneficiaries, whilst retaining the right to a fixed level of income for the remainder of their life.
The main aim is to reduce the eventual IHT bill on death, whilst still allowing the donor to receive an income from the gifted assets.
With ‘normal’ trusts, allowing the settlor to retain a benefit from the trust would lead to it being caught by the gift with reservation rules. However, as long as the DGT rules are followed, HMRC have confirmed there will be no gift with reservation.
How does a DGT work?
Settlor(s) make a transfer into a trust, and the trustees then invest that money into an investment bond.
The owners of the bond are the trustees.
The trust is usually a discretionary trust, to allow flexibility around apportioning assets to beneficiaries.
The trustees provide the settlor with a regular income, which is funded by making use of the 5% annual withdrawal facility available under the bond. This income is technically withdrawals of capital.
An actuarial calculation is carried out to determine the capital value of this income stream. Think of it a bit like an annuity that you would take with a pension fund.
The income stream would be fixed for life. It would be underwritten at outset to determine the settlor(s)’ life expectancy, and therefore the amount of the fund that will be paid to them during their lifetime.
Effectively, the underwriter is working out the capital amount that would be needed to provide certain amount of annual income over a specified period.
This value is known as the discount, and the actual level of the discount depends on factors such as the settlor’s age, state of health and the level of income taken.
For the purpose of IHT, within a DGT, the discount part of the transfer is deemed to be immediately outside of the estate. After all its gone and the settlor cant get their hands on it.
Would the remainder part of the transfer form part of a CLT?
Yes, the remaining part of a DGT transfer, (value with the discount deduction) would generally be a CLT if a discretionary trust was used. It could technically be a PET if a bare trust wrapper was chosen but that would be unusual as it has implications around potential beneficiaries. In fact, most DGT providers wouldn’t even allow a bare trust.
Any growth on the whole investment would be outside of the estate by virtue of being in a trust
In terms of a DGT, what happens with the value of the discount if the settlor dies within 7 years of making the gift?
The exact amount of discount is only relevant if the settlor dies within seven years of creating the trust, otherwise like any other trust it’s value would not be in the estate calculation.
The actual amount of discount is determined by HMRC on death, so the figure provided by the life office is not guaranteed. If full underwriting has been done however, it is likely that HMRC will accept the value.
The fact that the CLT created when a DGT is set up is lower than the whole transfer, means that there is less to go in any cumulation on death. A far bigger initial transfer could be made and invested, as it is only the CLT part that needs to be under the £325,000 nil rate band amount.
The longer the life expectancy and the higher the withdrawals are, the larger the amount of discount that will be available, as there will be larger amount of funds that will be returned to the settlor under the annual income payments.
Within a DGT, are the 5% withdrawal of capital allowed and how do they impact the trust?
It is important to remember however that the 5% withdrawals from an investment bond are not actually income payments, but withdrawals from capital. Therefore there will be no income tax implications until at least 100% of the capital has been used.
Based on taking the 5%, it will be 20 years before a chargeable event occurs, and at this time it will be chargeable on the settlor.
What happens if the income generated from a DGT is not spent?
To get the maximum benefit from the IHT savings on a DGT, the income that is being paid to the settlor each year should be spent, otherwise there is a risk that this amount is just building back up inside the estate.