Unit 2 Flashcards

(9 cards)

1
Q

1) Distinguish between the concepts “relevance,” “admissibility” and “assessment”.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

(b) Recognise and explain why the concept of relevance is one of the most important foundational concepts in the Law of Evidence to master.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

(c) Evaluate the rationale for the concept of relevance.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

(d) Explain the relationship between relevance and admissibility and make specific reference
to the case of S v Vand der Walt 2020 (2) SACR 371 (CC).

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

(f) Explain the concept of relevance in terms of the relation between an item of evidence and a material fact at issue in the case and apply the knowledge to a set of facts.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

(e) Define the concept of relevance and explain each component of that definition.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(g) Explain, pursuant to the example in R v Dhlamini 1960 (1) SA 880 (N), the concept of relevance in terms of the relation between an item of evidence and a material fact at
issue in the case.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

(h) Study Theophilopoulos C, Bellengere A — “Relevance, Admissibility and Probative Value
14© 2026 University of Pretoria
in a Rational System of Evidence: A South African Perspective” PER / PELJ 2022 (25)
[2022] PER 58.

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

(i) Know and understand the contents of Schwikkard & Mosaka: Chapter 5 (pages 45-54)

A
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly