What are the reasons that we write in standard form?
What are the two ways an argument can go wrong?
How is standard form supposed to be like?
Premises on their own line, numbered, and clearly stated. Conclusion on its own line and numbered.
How can we determine validity by playing pretend?
It is when we pretend the premises are true and ask ourselves then does the conclusion have to be true. If NOT then it’s invalid.
What is a valid argument?
If the premises are true, than conclusion HAS to be true.
What is a invalid argument?
not valid, it is possible for the premises to be true and the conclusion false
or the premises do not guarantee the truth of the conclusion.
What is the common pattern of valid arguments?
What are the six valid argument forms?
Argument by Elimination
Simplification
Modus Ponens
Modus Tollens
Hypothetical Syllogism
Equivalence
What are the two invalid argument forms?
Affirming the consequent
Denying the antecedent
What are the two kinds of validity?
semantic and modal
Semantic Validity
valid because it follows a valid form
Modal Validity
valid because of the meaning of the terms
True or false: Valid argument can have false premises.
True
What are the steps of argument evaluation?
Step 1 of argument evaluation: Determine if the argument is valid
Does the conclusion follow from the premises.
Step 2 of argument evaluation: Evaluate arguments premises