What is the first reading of a bill?
1.1
The government first introduced the bill to the House of Commons. This is a formal announcement of the bill, which is usually followed by a vote to move it to the next stage
What is the second reading?
1.1
The principles of the bill are debated and considered by the House of Commons and a vote is taken. If the vote is won, it moved onto the committee stage.
What is the committee stage?
1.1
The bill is examined in detail, by a small committee made up from different MP parties. The committee reports back to the house for any changes to the bill.
What is the report stage?
1.1
MPs are given the opportunity to consider the committees report and debate and vote on any amendments they wish to make
What is the third reading?
1.1
The final chance for the commons to debate the bills contents. No amendments are allowed at this stage - they either pass or reject it.
What is the Lords stage?
1.1
After the third reading, the bill goes to the Lords where it repeats the same stages as in the commons. If the Lords have amended the bill, it must return to the commons for debate, amendments, and passing or rejection.
What is the royal assent?
1.1
Once the bill has passed by the houses it goes to the monarch for signing. It is put into action as soon as possible after this.
What is the green paper?
1.1
Before a bill is sent to parliament, the government usually publishes a green paper. This is an initial report to provoke public discussion of the subject. It often includes questions for interested individuals and organisations to respond to.
What is a white paper?
1.1
After the consultation, the government produces a white paper, which is a document setting out their detailed plans for legislation. It often includes a draft version of the Bill.
Example of an act passed by Parliament?
1.1
Criminal justice act 2003 - introduced a change in the double jeopardy rule, following Ann Mings successful campaign and the recommendations of the Macpherson report.
Define veto
1.1
A right to reject a decision or proposal made by a law making body.
What is the judicial precedent?
1.1
A legal principle where the decisions made by higher courts are binding on lower courts in future cases with similar facts.
What does it ensure?
1.1
Consistency and fairness in the legal system
What role does the Supreme Court play in the judicial precedent?
1.1
The Supreme Court is the highest court in the UK, and it’s decisions are binding on all lower courts. It can overrule its previous decisions, allowing it to adapt the law to new circumstances and correct past errors
What are the three types of statutory interpretation?
1.1
Literal rule, golden rule, mischief rule
What is the literal rule?
1.1
Judges should use the everyday, ordinary meanings of a word in a statue. However words often have several meanings
What is the golden rule?
1.1
Sometimes the literal rule can lead to an absurd result, the golden rule is meant to modify the literal rule to avoid this
What is the mischief rule?
1.1
Allows the court to enforce what the statue was intended for, not its literal meaning
What is judicial precedent?
1.1
A legal principle where decisions made by higher courts are binding on lower courts in future cases with similar acts. It ensures consistency and fairness in the legal system.
How does the judicial precedent work?
1.1
It operated through a hierarchy of courts. Higher courts, such as the Supreme Court, set precedents that lower courts must follow. When a higher court makes a ruling, the reasons for their decision becoming binding precedent.
Advantages of judicial precedent?
1.1
Consistency and predictability - ensures similar cases are treated alike.
Efficiency - reduces the time needed to resolve disputes as past cases can provide guidance.
Flexibility - allows the law to adapt over time through distinguishing and overruling precedents.
Disadvantages of the judicial precedent?1.1
Rigidity - can make it hard to adapt to new situations
Complexity - vast number of cases can make it difficult to find relevant precedents
Can lower courts ever avoid following a precedent?
1.1
Yes -> 2 ways this can happen
Distinguishing - finding significant differences in the facts of the of the case that make the precedent inapplicable
Overruling - where a court higher up the hierarchy states that a legal decision in an earlier case is wrong and overturns it
Example of an overruling precedent?
1.1
The law on marital rape is an overruling precedent. A husband had been convicted of attempting to rape his wife, he appealed on the grounds of a centuries old law that he be found not guilty. The appeal court overruled this however as the idea of irreversible consent was unacceptable today.