Define Vicarious Liability
Is the legal imposition of liability upon an overseeing party for the tort of another, who they are responsible for.
What are the 2 tests for vicarious liability?
Barclays Bank Plc v Various claimants
doctor-sexual assault
was an independent contractor
2.The tortious actions must fall within the course of employment or be sufficiently closely connected to the employment- case
Jehovah Witnesses v BXB
Female was raped
not liable as it was not closely connected to employment/course of employment
What are the 3 tests to determine a” relationship of employment”
Factors to find a relationship akin to employment ( make it fair, just and reasonable to hold them responsible)
By the Christian Brothers case
Cox v ministry of justice
Liable as there was a reltionship
The case for Factors to find a relationship akin to employment ( make it fair, just and reasonable to hold them responsible).
The tortious actions must fall within the course of employment
Actions in the course of employment….
Shelborne v CRUK
“Frolic of their own”
Rose v Plenty
The tortfeasor is acting in the course of employment, so can be liable
What are the two ways considered outside of the course of employment
Mohamud V Morrisons supermarket
Responding to customers was an aspect of the tortfeasors job- abuse was connected. Following him to his car did not mean it was unconnected as he was still working.
Lister v Hesley
Intentional and unauthorised wrongdoings commited by the tortfeasor for their own benefit can still be under VL.
Morrisons Supermarket v Various Claimants
If an employee intentionally harms the employer, as an vendetta to the employer, the tort will not be considered closely connected and will not be in the course of employment.
Control test Mersey Docks v Coggins
Loaned out employers but employer still had control
Integration test Ready Mixed Concrete v Ministry of Pensions
Lorry driver, was used for own business and then aswell
Economic reality test Carmichael v National Power
0 hour contract