Vicarious Liability Flashcards

(26 cards)

1
Q

What is vicarious liability?

A

One person is liable for a tort committed by another, usually an employer who is liable for any tort committed by their employee in the course of employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
2
Q

Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978

A
  • Employer is entitled to recover any compensation paid out to the claimant from the employee
  • e.g by deductions in wages
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
3
Q

What is the two stage test that must be satisfied?

A
  • 1) Relationship between D and tortfeasor must employment or ‘akin to’ employment
  • 2) Must be a close connection between wrongful conduct and acts the tortfeasor was authorised to do so it can be regarded as done by the tortfeasor in the course of employment
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
4
Q

What is a tortfeasor?

A

The person who committed the tort and for whom the D is taking legal responsibility

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
5
Q

Stage 1 (St1) Employee relationship

A
  • Employer is only liable for torts committed by employees
  • If a person is injured because of the negligence of an independent contractor, they must sue them instead
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
6
Q

Case for St1

A

Barclays Bank v Various Claimants

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
7
Q

What are the 4 tests for employee status? (St1)

A
  • Control test
  • Integration test
  • Economic reality test
  • Akin to employment test
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
8
Q

Control test (St1)

A

Ability to control the way a job is done: employee is told what to do and how to do it

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
9
Q

Case for control test (St1)

A

Mersey Docks & Harbour Board v Coggins and Griffiths

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
10
Q

Integration test (St1)

A

Will be an employee if their work is fully integrated into the business, not if it’s only an accessory to the business

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
11
Q

Case for integration test (St1)

A

Stevenson, Jordan and Harrison v MacDonald and Evans

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
12
Q

Economic reality test (St1)

A

3 factors must exist before a worker can be classified as an employee:
- 1) employee agrees to provide work/skill in return for wage
- 2) Employee accepts the work will be subject to control of the employer
- 3) All other considerations in the contract are consistent with there being a contract of employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
13
Q

Case for economic reality test (St1)

A

Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of Pensions

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
14
Q

Factors relating to economic reality that are considered (economic reality test, St1)

A
  • Who bears the chance of profit/loss?
  • Is the worker paid a regular salary or paid by job?
  • Does the worker pay income tax/national insurance
  • Can the worker delegate work to another, take on work from someone else or decide when to do a job?
How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
15
Q

Akin to employment test (St1)

A

Can be vicariously liable for someone who is not technically their employee but the relationship between them is sufficiently akin to employment

How well did you know this?
1
Not at all
2
3
4
5
Perfectly
16
Q

Case for akin to employment test (St1)

A

Catholic Child Welfare Society v Various Claimants

17
Q

Stage 2 (St2) close connection test

A

Wrongful act must be so closely connected with acts that the tortfeasor was authorised to do that it can be regarded as in the course of employment

18
Q

Employee acting negligently (St2)

A

If an employee does their job badly which causes damage to another
Can be VL

19
Q

Case for employee acting negligently (St2)

A

Century Insurance v Northern Ireland Transport Board

20
Q

Acting against orders (St2)

A

Acts against orders in the way they do their job
Can be VL

21
Q

Case for acting against orders (St2)

A

Limpus v London General Omnibus

22
Q

Employee acting on a frolic of their own (St2)

A
  • Caused injury/damage to another when doing something that has nothing to do with their employment
  • Time/place outside of work
  • Not VL
23
Q

Case for employee acting on a frolic of their own (St2)

A

Hilton v Thomas Burton

24
Q

Travelling (employee acting on a frolic of their own, St2)

A

Travelling to and from work is usually outside course of employment, but travelling between workplaces the employer can be VL

25
Criminal acts of an employee (St2)
Offences against the person considered torts of trespass to the person so an employer can be VL provided there is a close connection between the crime and the acts the employee was authorised to deal
26
Case for criminal acts of an employee (St2)
Lister v Hesley Hall