What is vicarious liability?
It’s when one person (usually an employer) is held legally responsible for the tort of another (usually an employee). It’s a form of strict liability based on the relationship between the tortfeasor (T) and the defendant (D).
What must the claimant (C) prove first?
That a tort, not a crime, was committed and caused a recognised loss or injury.
What case shows this principle?
Poland v Parr – Employer liable when employee assaulted a boy to protect master’s goods.
What must be shown for vicarious liability to apply?
That the tortfeasor was an employee or in a relationship akin to employment.
What does the control test focus on?
Whether the employer controls what and how the employee does their work.
Case for control test?
Hawley v Luminar Leisure – Club exercised control over bouncer ⇒ vicarious liability found.
What does the integration test look at?
How integrated the worker is within the business.
Case for integration test?
Stevenson, Jordan & Harrison v McDonald and Evans – Workers integrated into core business likely to be employees.
What factors are considered under the multiple test?
Control, personal performance, and mutuality of obligation.
Case for the multiple test?
Ready Mixed Concrete v Minister of Pensions.
Explain the three factors:
Control: Employer directs how work is done.
Personal performance: Worker must do job personally (Express & Echo Publications v Tanton).
Mutuality of obligation: Employer must provide work and employee must accept it (Carmichael v National Power).
When is a relationship “akin to employment”?
When there’s no formal contract, but the relationship meets fairness criteria.
Case for akin to employment?
Catholic Child Welfare Society v Various Claimants (Christian Brothers).
What are the five fairness criteria?
Employer more likely to compensate victim and has insurance.
Act done on behalf of employer.
Activity part of employer’s business.
Employer created the risk by employing the worker.
Employer exercised some control.
Are employers liable for torts of independent contractors?
Generally no – they are not employees.
Case: Barclays Bank v Various Claimants
When will the employer be liable?
If the tort occurred in the course of employment or was closely connected to it
When is the employer liable?
If employee commits a tort while doing an authorised act negligently.
Case: Century Insurance v Northern Ireland Road Transport Board – Driver’s careless act while working made employer liable.
Can an employer be liable for forbidden acts?
Yes, if the act was done in the course of employment, even if forbidden.
Case: Rose v Plenty – Milkman using boy to help with deliveries still “in course of employment.”
Is the employer liable for unauthorised acts?
No, not if the act was completely outside employment.
Case: Beard v London General Omnibus Co – Bus conductor driving bus not part of employment.
When does the close connection test apply?
When the tort is closely connected to the employee’s role.
Key cases for close connection?
Lister v Hesley Hall – Warden’s assaults closely connected to his duties.
Dubai Aluminium v Salaam – Tort part of business activity.
When is the employer not liable?
If the employee was acting entirely outside of employment.
Case: Twine v Beans Express – Driver giving unauthorised lift not in course of employment.
What happens if vicarious liability is established?
The employer (D) will be liable to pay damages to C.
Can the employer recover compensation from the employee?
Yes – under the Civil Liability (Contribution) Act 1978.