Three safeguards against ID evidence:
When should a Turnbull direction be given?
When the prosecution case depends WHOLLY or SUBSTANTIALLY on visual identification
R v Turnbull:
When relevant, TJ should:
If D’s presence at the scene is admitted:
No Turnbull required but in some circumstances, it still will be
If ID evidence is deficient and unsupported by sufficient alternative evidence:
Turnbull requires TJ to invited defence to make a submission for acquittal
ADVOKATE
A - amount of time under observation D - distance V - visibility O - obstruction K - known/seen before A - any reason to remember T - time lapse E - error or material discrepancy