algevall, definition
o He speaks of the ‘spirit of capitalism’ yet does not define what is meant by ‘spirit’
o Algevall argues that W is concerned with a ‘particular mode of conduct adequate for capitalism’ (160)
algevall, natural
agevall on weber thesis
♣ ‘Stating Weber’s thesis as ‘Protestantism caused…. Capitalism’ is wrong on all accounts… The historical individual to be explained is not capitalism; the explanans is not Protestantism’ (171)
♣ Weber focuses on the spirit of capitalism. Link between capitalism and Prot is not causal but about ‘convergence’ (171)
♣ ‘The relation Weber describes is not a relationship between two systems of ideas, but between a particular belief and a collective mode of conduct’ (172-3)
Marshall
Hamilton relevance
Hamilton, other reasons
coleman, macro/micro
o Weber shows the ‘effect of Protestant doctrine (macro level) on individual values (micro level) … What he fails to show is how these individual values (micro level) combine to produce the structure of economic organisation that we call capitalism (macro level)’.
but…hernes
- Hernes argues against Coleman’s criticism, claiming ‘Weber not only demonstrates the effect of doctrine on values and their impact in turn on economic behaviour. Weber constructs a model to provide the psycho-logic at the individual level’ (230)
o Cites Weber’s explanation of how inner loneliness provoked the change in ‘Calvinists’ orientation from social relations to detached, isolated yet devout, work in a calling’ (231)
- Rejects the view that Weber’s argument is unfounded and therefore must be rejected
Logic of argument is sound for Hernes. Weber offers different models of humanity in order to demonstrate his arguments
breiner
etzrodt on protestant ethic
‘The Protestant ethic consists basically of two elements: a code of behaviour and a sanction system that compels the believer to adhere to these ethical imperatives. The code of behaviour again demanded two things of the believer: a strict work ethic and asceticism’ (53)
etzrodt challenges to thesis
o ‘The correctness of the interpretation of the Neo-Calvinist teachings and the derivation of Weber’s so-called Protestant ethic can be questioned.’ (58)
o ‘The historical connection between the Protestant ethic and the spirit of modern capitalism can be criticized.’ (58)
o And the creation of modern capitalism (with its manifestation in the Industrial Revolution) in England by this spirit of modern capitalism and other variables such as rational book keeping can be challenged.’ (58)
lipset and bendix
o Only observable difference between RCC and Prots is amongst immigrants of those faiths
♣ ‘The Protestant immigrants come from ethnic groups with high status while the Catholics are members of ethnic groups with low status…Hence the difference between Catholic and Protestant immigrants may be related to ethnic rather than to religious factors’ (22) pp.50-51 in study
McClelland
o Argues that it is difficult to decide which groups of Catholics/Protestants are ‘representative’
o There are examples of Catholic Groups who are superior to Protestants in their sense of drive to achieve.
walzer
o Puritans were more political than economic. Work-ethic was political.
o Views Calvin as putting forward a political, rather than religio-philosophical ideology
o ‘There is no doubt in Walzer’s mind: Calvin must be understood as developing an ideology of political absolutism.’ (417)
o No direct link between a religion of politics and the development of the spirit of capitalism. Rather, it was about the psychological terror that Calvinism procured, which ultimately forced people to worship God.
♣ ‘Puritanism was “really” a theology of repression whose central concern was the coercive imposition of a rigid, domineering conception of moral and social order’ (418)
fischoff on Marx
fischoff on W aims
Carr on sociological approach to business
rachfahl criticism of w
Felix Rachfahl argues that Max Weber is incorrect concerning historical detail of the Dutch case. He uses the “liberal’ ideas of the rich merchants of Amsterdam to argue that Weber was wrong.
- Rachfahl argues that most Dutch merchants were not strict Calvinists
♣ Claims that the majority of the Low Countries’ wealth was accumulated before Calvinism and that much of the Dutch wealth was from Flemish immigrants
‘Rachfahl argues for a variety of alternative political reasons for capitalist development, such as the non-suppression of religious dissent and subordination of church to state in certain countries.
Fischer on beruf
o Fischer argues that the significance of Luther’s use of ‘Beruf’ is overexaggerated. It is likely that he used the word not to create a religious system, but rather used the most understandable expression for people.
o Fischer questions why Puritans focused so much on the idea of calling rather than any other form of activity.
o ‘For the Puritans to think in terms of relationships of debt to God, key economic institutions must have already been in place.’ (28)
- w is too negative. following one’s calling should be linked to motives of self-fulfilment not isolation
w response to fischer
o Argues that he ‘established at length how and why the idea of the ‘calling’ in its Lutheran form differed in kind from its shape in ‘ascetic’ Protestantism, where it formed an integral constituent [integrierender Bestandteil] of the capitalist ‘spirit’’- 32
w response to rachfahl
o ‘Weber responds by indicating that he is not concerned with Calvinism, per se but with an Ideal Type Model of the worldly Protestant asceticism’ (120)
o ‘My chosen task – laid out as clearly as possible in my essay – was first and foremost to establish not where and how strongly but how, through what psychological structures of motivation, particular forms of Protestant belief came to exert the effects they did’ 70
otsuka
ethos theory
o ‘ Otsuka’s wholehearted promotion of Weber’s ethos theory, occurring amidst the calls for democratization and modernization in postwar Japan, were instrumental in directing Weber studies toward the problem of what Otsuka called “human types” (ningen ruikei) which provided one of the principle ideological supports for the modernization drive.’ (211)
Yangawa Keiichi
♣ ‘Religious organizations that attempted to become modern, rational, and relevant to contemporary society that responded to the expectations of religious scholars, continue to stagnate and decline. Instead, the greatest growth being seen in conservative, doctrinaire, return-to-the-origins fundamentalism; strongly authoritarian movements; secret associations; non-Christian traditions such as exotic Oriental-appearing mysticism; and occult movements. (Yanagawa 1975, p.48)
Mahon
o ‘The proposition of this paper is that the rise of modern capitalism was a religiously inspired transformation of culture is equally applicable to understanding Chinese couples’ persisting quest for male offspring’ (76)
o ‘This paper offers the proposition that Weber’s analytical construct provides equally fertile application in the analysis of simultaneous cultural persistence and change in non-Western civilizations. The Chinese preference for sons originated amid the ancient reaches of Chinese folk religion’s demand that parents’ funeral rites and three years of mourning be presided over by their first-born son, lest the parents’ souls be relegated to an eternal destiny of wandering the world as hungry ghosts. The argument offered here is that the endurance of this preference for sons, as evidenced by demographers’ findings of significantly distorted sex ratios in contemporary China, can be explained, as was the rise of modern capitalism, by Weber’s conception of a cultural trans formation from substantive to formal rationality.’ (59)
koch, tension