1
Q
Assessment instruments - Structured clinical interview for personality disorders cluster A ,B, and C
A
semi-structured interview to assess DSM-5 personality disorders cluster A, B, and C
- for DSM-5 personality disorder (SCID-5-PD)
- Done according to a categorical approach, but with the recent version of the SCID-5-PD there is as well the possibility of scoring severity with a dimensional approach by calculating a severity index per classification
- Has been widely researched as an instrument to investigate comorbidity and the underlying structure of personality psychopathology
- Has been cross-validated with other instruments measuring personality disorders
2
Q
Assessment instruments - Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV personality
A
- Semi-structured diagnostic interview for personality disorders
- Questions are arranged by themes rather than by disorders to minimize the focus on personality pathology and to reduce interviewer bias
- Each criterion is rated on a scale from zero to three
- Interrater reliability of the SIDP-IV has been found to be good in non-treatment seeking individuals and psychiatric outpatients
3
Q
Assessment instruments - Structured clinical interview for DSM-V personality
A
- Measures five domains based on the FFM and 25 maladaptive negative traits of personality of the DSM-5 AMPD
- Demonstrates good construct validity with respect to the internal structure, good convergent, discriminant, and criterion validity, and also good convergent validity with other models of personality such as the PSY-5 and the Five-Factor Model
4
Q
Assessment instruments - Semi-structured interview for personality functioning DSM-5
A
- Measures the level of personality functioning according to the AMPD
- Research is still limited
- Interrater reliability among an outpatient sample was adequate to good across dimensions
- STiP-5.1 was correlated with impairments in self-functioning and interpersonal functioning and other measures of personality impairment
