according to wiredu what role does culture and tradition play in answering philosophical questions, particularly after the legacy of colonialism
what is the objection to wiredu’s view that language can play a direct role in addressing philosophical questions against the legacy of colonialism?
wiredu is merely assuming that the language provides philosophical insight, or that the predispositions of the language impart truth
- linguistic facts cannot be used as a decisive argument for or against a philosophical position
how does wiredu reply to the objection
adwene
the closest approximation to “mind”- a capacity that depends on the brain (amene). Additionally, a person is constituted by a body (nipadua)
okra
“life-giving entity”- what makes one a human being. A capacity for rationality.
There is a disagreement about how to render “okra” in English.
sunsum
“that which gives one personality”- non physical, but perishes at death. psychological traits- courage, kindness, honesty, jealousy
how does wiredu object to Descartes view that the mind is a substance (using Akan terms)
if, in Akan, the mind is a capacity that depends on the functioning of the brain, then it would be odd for it to be though of as a substance
- from the concept of mind in Akan, one can straigthaway rule out any prospect of a cartesian dualism
Descartes argument that the mind is a substance
I think therefore I exist
- “while I saw that I could pretend that I had no body and that there was no world and no place for me to be in, I still couldn’t pretend that I didn’t exist”
“ from the mere fact thought about doubting the truth of other things, it followed quite evidently and certainly that I existed”… independent of my physical body, therefore the mind is a thinking thing, a substance.