Why is learning important
To make predictions about events in an environment and to control them. Learning exists to allow an organism to exploit and benefit from regularities in the environment
-must know what cue to pay attention to
How to identify if events are related
• Degree of contingency
–One method is to examine how often the two event co-occur
• Degree of covariation or correlation
–A second method is to consider whether the events appear together or independently
Classical Conditioning
Unconditioned stimulus -> Unconditioned response
US + Stimulus -> Conditional repond (stimulus is a conditional stimulus)
US then would evoke CR on its own
Operant Conditioning
Behaviouris shaped by the learner’s history of experiencing rewards and punishments for their actions.
Positive and negative reward
Positive and Negative punishment
Operant Conditioning:
Blocking Paradigm
What does blocking paradigm show
The Blocking effect shows that learning involves more than just monitoring co-occurrences
–If co-occurrence were the sole factor, then we would expect 50:50 responses between the food and juice in the test phase, but animals prefer the juice
Non-associative learning:
Refers to processes including habituation, priming and perceptual learning
Non-associative learning: Habituation
-Done through a series of exposure
– learning to ignore a stimulus because it is trivial (e.g. screening out background noises).
-because it has been learned
Non-associative learning: Priming
Non-associative learning: Perceptual Learning: Unitization
experiment for Non-associative learning: Perceptual Learning: Unitization
-Task of visual search where single feature cannot aid search
- There are two conditions:
–Target is always the same: consistent mapping
–Target differs on every trial: varied mapping
When the same target is always presented, people can learn to unitize features of the target and find it very quickly
Learning contingencies
Outcome Absent
Cue present a b
Cue absent c d
Delta P+ P(0?C0- P(O/-C)
=a/a+b - c(c-d)
Delta-P
Delta-P is a measure of the strength of contingency between a cue and an outcome
If people learn optimally, then their responses should reflect the magnitude of Delta-P
Are people sensitive to
People rate contingent associations as having a higher rating but overestimate noncontingent associations
Bliket detection task one cause and two cause
One-cause condition
Red block activates the detector
Cyan brick does not activate the detector
when children is asked , red is blicket
Two-Cause Condition
-when two item activate the bliket both are consider bliket
Bliket detection task backward and indirect
Backward: both objects activate, A activate by itself, when asked only A is considered
Indirect Screening: Both object active but one (B) does not activete itself. When asked, A P=1, B p=2/3
Probabilistic contrast model
® Tells us that when the background is variable, we need to conditionalize on the background to understand the strength of the contingencies in the environment.
® This tells us that people are sensitive to the context in which information is presented
Problem with delta P
Assumptions of the Standard Model
The Rescorla-Wagner model
Red light (X) and bell (Y) acts as predictor for reward (cheese)
V is existing connection
EV: Sum of associative strengths across all stimuli
lamba is the strength of Unconditioned Stimulus
Difference between maximum strength and current strength (10-1.5) = 8.5
DeltaVx= gamma (lamda-EV)
gamma is learning rate. higer gamma or differences lead to bigger changes
Further evidence for the role of attention in learning
• Blocking –Can also be explained by RW model • Highlighting • Unidimensional category boundaries are easier than diagonal boundaries –Cannot be explained by RW model
Evidence for Attention II:
Highlighting
Early TrainingRed Light + Bell Food
Late TrainingRed Light + Bell Food
Red Light + Alarm Juice
TestBell + Alarm Juics