“Question about distal humerus fracture in low demand elderly patient, medically sick, what is true regarding non-operative treatment (repeat)<br></br><br></br><b><div><b><span>1. ⅔ have good to excellent subjective function, average rom 25-125</span></b><br></br></div><div><span>2. ⅓ with good to excellent subjective function, average ROM 45-90</span></div><div><span>3. Do poorly as above elbow splint is poorly tolerated</span></div><div><span>4. 80% nonunion</span></div></b><br></br>”
“<b><span>⅔ have good to excellent subjective function, average rom 25-125</span></b>”
“<b><div>Anatomical landmark used for acetabular version in THA<br></br><br></br></div><div><span>1. labrum</span></div><div><span>2. Posterior wall</span></div><div><span>3. Ligamentum teres<br></br>4. TAL</span></div></b><br></br>”
“<b><div><span>TAL</span></div><div><a><span>https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/230949901302100215</span></a></div><div><span>AO Recon:</span></div><div><span>Bassam Masri, MD, and Head of Orthopaedics at the University of British Columbia, Canada, shared his preferred approach to determining cup version:</span></div><div><span>“The most important landmark for determining the cup ante-version if the transverse acetabular ligament (TAL). In most hips, the TAL is well-preserved and if the inferior aspect of the cup is placed parallel to the TAL, the correct anteversion is typically selected. In the absence of a TAL, I estimate its position by drawing a liner along the axis of the fovea centralis, which would be perpendicular to the position of the TAL.”</span></div></b><br></br>”
“<b><div>Patient with Open TIbia fx. What is true regarding open tibia fracture<br></br><br></br></div><div><span>1. Vanco powder has been assiociated with nephrotoxicity</span></div><div><span>2. No difference in outcome as long as get antibiotic withini 6 hours</span></div><div><span>3. No diff in outcome as long as I&D done within 24h</span></div><div><span>4. Abx for 5 days after wound closure is required to improve outcome</span></div></b><br></br>”
“<b><div><span>3. No diff in outcome as long as I&D done within 24h<br></br><br></br></span></div><div><span>Historically, dogma has led orthopaedists to treat open fractures with surgical irrigation and debridement within six hours of the injury or risk increased rates of infection. This practice has come to be known as the “six hour rule” in orthopaedic surgery. However, it has been disproven in recent years by several high quality studies demonstrating that delaying surgical irrigation and debridement up to 24 hours does not increase infectious complications for open fractures. Based on the best available evidence, the panel does not endorse the “six hour rule. Taking these issues into consideration, the panel recommends that patients with open fractures should be taken to the operating room </span><span>for surgical irrigation and debridement within 24 hours of presentation to the emergency department whenever possible (AAOS)<br></br><br></br></span></div><div><span>Antibiotic Prophylaxis in </span><span>Open</span><span> Fractures: Evidence, Evolving Issues, and Recommendations</span></div><div>Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons<span>: </span><a><span>April 15, 2020 - Volume 28 - Issue 8 - p 309-315</span></a></div><div><span>- First dose antibiotics most important</span></div><div><span>- Topical Vanco reduces infection rates but has to be given in OR within 24hrs from injury (rat model, no human evidence)</span></div><div><span>- Delayed OR does not change risk of infection</span></div><div><span>- Stop antibiotics 24 hours after definitive fixation (no role for prolonged Abx therapy)<br></br><br></br></span></div><div><span>Time to initial operative treatment following open fracture does not impact development of deep infection: a prospective cohort study of 736 subject. Study from EDMONTON.<br></br><br></br></span></div><span>Multivariate regression found no association between infection and time to surgery [odds ratio (OR)</span><span>,</span></b>”
“<b>Elderly lady gets a distal humerus fracture, low demand, unfit for surgery, what is true?<br></br></b><b><ol><li><div><span>⅔ have good to excellent outcome with ROM 20-125 degree</span></div></li><li><div><span>⅓ has good to excellent outcome with ROM 45-90</span></div></li><li><div><span>Universally poorly because they cannot tolerate sling</span></div></li><li><div><span>80% non-union</span></div></li></ol></b>”
“2/3 have good outcomes and ROM 20-125<br></br><br></br><b><div><span><img></img></span></div><br></br><div><span><span>At a mean of 27 14 months of follow-up, 68% (13 of 19) of patients reported good to excellent subjective outcomes. Outcomes in 2 patients were classified as poor, one of whom underwent total elbow arthroplasty as a result. <br></br><br></br>Overall, the mean score on the Patient Rated Elbow Evaluation was 16 23 and the Mayo Elbow Performance Index was 90 11. <br></br><br></br>When the injured was compared with the uninjured side, extension (22</span><span> </span><span>11</span><span> </span><span>vs 8</span><span> </span><span>12; P 1⁄4 .025) and flexion (128</span><span> </span><span>16</span><span> </span><span>vs 142</span><span> </span><span><span>7; P 1⁄4 .002) were significantly worse in the injured elbows. </span><br></br><br></br>–> ROM 22 - 128 in the non op group<br></br><br></br><span>The fracture union rate was 81% (22 of 27) at a mean radiographic follow-up of 12 months.</span></span></span></div><div><span><br></br>Conclusions: Satisfactory outcomes were observed after the nonoperative management of selected distal humeral fractures in lower-demand, medically unwell, or older patients. Fracture union can be expected in most patients.</span></div></b><br></br>”
“<b><div>Based on the following stress-strain curve, what is true:</div><ol><li><div><span>Have the same yield point but different modulus of elasticity</span></div></li><li><div><span>Have the same modulus of elasticity but different yield points</span></div></li><li><div><span>The toughness of bone is more than the toughness of tendon</span></div></li><li><div><span>The toughness of tendon is more than the toughness of bone</span></div></li></ol></b>”
“<b><div><span>– toughness of tendon is more than bone</span></div><div><span><br></br>Modulous of elasticity = stress/strain</span></div><div><span>Toughness = area under stress-strain curve</span></div><div><span>Yield = limit of elastic behaviour and start of plastic behaviour</span></div></b><br></br>”
“<b><div>What is associated with failure of a Halo application (repeat)?</div><ol><li><div><span>6 pins instead 4 pins</span></div></li><li><div><span>Ring 2cm above pinna</span></div></li><li><div><span>Decreasing distance between ring and skull</span></div></li><li><div><span>Retightening the pins at appropriate intervals</span></div></li></ol></b>”
“B. Ring above pinna<br></br><br></br><b><div><span>More pins = more stable</span></div><div><span>Decreased ring to skull distance is stronger</span></div><div><span>Retightning pins reduces loosening/failure</span></div><div><span>1cm above pinna</span></div></b><br></br>”
“<b><div><span>Mechanism of action of bone morphogenetic proteins (repeat)</span></div><ol><li><div><span>Recruits Mesenchymal stem cells</span></div></li><li><div><span>Induces differentiation of Osteoblast precursors into osteoblast</span></div></li><li><div><span>RANKL</span></div></li><li><div><span>Something that was blatantly wrong</span></div></li></ol></b>”
“Shit question, repeat<br></br><br></br><div><span>OKU 10</span></div> <div><span>○ </span><span>Induces differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells into osteoproginator cells</span></div> <div><span>○ </span><span>Recruitment of mesenchymal stem cells</span></div> <div>○ Stimulation of angiogenesis<br></br><br></br></div><div>Orthobullets:</div> <div>● RANKL is secreted by osteoblasts and binds to the RANK receptor on osteoclast precursor and mature osteoclast cells</div> <div>● RANKL binds RANK and stimulates osteoclastic bone resorption<br></br><br></br></div> <div><span>● </span><span>BMP stimulates undifferentiated perivascular mesenchymal cells to differentiate into osteoblasts through serine-threonine kinase receptors</span></div><br></br>”
“<b><div><span>Atypical femur fracture - what is true?</span></div><ol><li><div><span>Malunion is common with IM nail fixation</span></div></li><li><div><span>Prophylactic nailing of the contralateral side only if they have symptoms</span></div></li><li><div><span>Need continuous bisphosphonate use for 10 years</span></div></li><li><div><span>Fracture line starts medial, and if complete, ends lateral</span></div></li></ol></b>”
“<b><div><span>A. Consensus<br></br><br></br>B is debated, since it says ““only”“<br></br><br></br>Surgical Management of </span><span>Atypical</span><span> </span><span>Femur</span><span> </span><span>Fractures</span><span> Associated With Bisphosphonate Therapy<br></br><br></br></span></div><div><span>Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: </span><a><span>December 15, 2018 - Volume 26 - Issue 24 - p 864-871</span></a></div><div><span>doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-16-00717</span></div><br></br><div><span>A – often translational defect with nail if you eccentrically ream because the pedestal (beak) pushes the reamer medially. But perhaps this is more malreduction and not malunion.<br></br><br></br></span></div><div><span>B – if asymptomatic then surveil</span></div><div><span>AFF risk linked to bisphosphonate use for 3 or more years</span></div></b><br></br>”
“<b><div>Treatment of high grade undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (MFH) of bone</div><ol><li><div><span>Surgery</span></div></li><li><div><span>Surgery, chemo, and rads</span></div></li><li><div><span>Surgery and rads</span></div></li><li><div><span>Surgery and chem</span></div></li></ol></b>”
“<b><ol><li><div><span>Surgery and chemo</span></div></li></ol><div>Management (similar to osteosarcoma)</div><ul><li><div><span>Neo-adjunctive chemotherapy, wide resection, postoperative chemotherapy +/- radiation</span></div></li><li><div><span>standard of care</span></div></li></ul><ul><li><div><span>chemotherapy</span></div></li><ul><li><div><span>preoperative chemotherapy given for 8-12 weeks followed by maintenance chemotherapy for 6-12 months after surgical resection</span></div></li></ul><li><div><span>surgical resection</span></div></li><ul><li><div><span>wide excision or amputation have been found to have a higher 5-year survival rate than those who received intralesional or marginal excision</span></div></li><li><div><span>trend towards limb salvage whenever possible</span></div></li><li><div><span>options include arthroplasty, resection arthrodesis, allograft reconstruction and rotationplasty</span></div></li></ul><li><div><span>radiation</span></div></li><ul><li><div><span>incomplete or questionable margins in order to reduce risk of local recurrence</span></div></li><li><div><span>adjunct to traditional chemotherapy and surgical regimens</span></div></li></ul></ul></b>”
“<b><div>What is true of plate-pretensioning</div><ol><li><div><span>Center of plate on bone and distal and proximal edges of the plate off bone</span></div></li><li><div><span>Center of the plate off of bone and distal and proximal edges on bone</span></div></li><li><div><span>Use a hinged tensioning device</span></div></li></ol></b>”
“<b><span>2. Off bone in center<br></br><img></img><br></br><br></br><br></br><br></br><br></br></span></b>”
“<b><div>Most common cause for early failure in a mobile bearing medial UKA</div><ol><li><div><span>Progression of arthritis to tricompartmental arthritis</span></div></li><li><div><span>Infection</span></div></li><li><div><span>Loosening of implants</span></div></li><li><div><span>Bearing dislocation</span></div></li></ol></b>”
“<b><div><span>Medial </span><span>Unicompartmental</span><span> Arthroplasty of the Knee<br></br><br></br></span></div><div><span>Jennings, Jason M. MD, DPT; Kleeman-Forsthuber, Lindsay T. MD; Bolognesi, Michael P. MD</span></div><div><span>Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: </span><a><span>March 1, 2019 - Volume 27 - Issue 5 - p 166-17</span></a></div><span><br></br>A recent systematic review found that the most common reasons for UKA failure were aseptic loosening (36%), progression of osteoarthritis (20%), unexplained pain (11%), instability (6%), infection (5%), and polyethylene wear (4%).<span><br></br></span></span><span><span><br></br></span><span>The majority of early failures (<5 years) were from aseptic loosening (25%), osteoarthritis progression (20%), and bearing dislocation (17%)</span></span><span>, whereas </span><u>midterm and later revisions were performed primarily for osteoarthritis progression (38 to 40%),</u><span> aseptic loosening (29%), and polyethylene wear (10%)</span><span><br></br><br></br>Early: < 5years<br></br>1. Aseptic loosening<br></br>2. intability<br></br>3. infection<br></br>4. poly wear<br></br><br></br>Mid - late<br></br>1. Progression of arthritis<br></br>2. Aseptic loosening<br></br>3. Polywear<br></br><br></br><br></br></span></b>”
“<b><div>62 yo guy falls off a ladder, X-ray shows a comminuted radial head fracture, and 25% coronoid fracture. What is the best treatment?</div><ol><li><span>Radial head replacement, ORIF coronoid, LUCL repair</span><br></br></li><li><div><span>ORIF radial head, ORIF coronoid, LUCL repair</span></div></li><li><div><span>ORIF coronoid, ORIF radial head, hinged ex-fix</span></div></li><li><div><span>Radial head replacement, ORIF coronoid, MCL repair</span></div></li></ol></b>”
“<div style=""><span></span><b>What is the most common cause of early failure in a </b><u><b>medial mobile-bearing</b></u><b> unicondylar knee arthroplasty?</b></div><ol style=""><li><div><span>Polyethylene wear</span></div></li><li><div><span>Bearing dislocation</span></div></li><li><div><span>Aseptic loosening</span></div></li><li><div><span>Progressive degenerative changes in the lateral compartment</span></div></li></ol>”
“3. Aseptic loosening<br></br><br></br><b><div><span>Medial </span><span>Unicompartmental</span><span> Arthroplasty of the Knee</span></div><div><span>Jennings, Jason M. MD, DPT; Kleeman-Forsthuber, Lindsay T. MD; Bolognesi, Michael P. MD</span></div><div><a><span>Author Information</span></a></div><div><span>Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons: </span><a><span>March 1, 2019 - Volume 27 - Issue 5 - p 166-176</span></a></div><div><span>doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-17-00690</span></div><br></br><span>A recent systematic review found that the most common reasons for UKA failure were </span><span>aseptic loosening (36%)</span><span>, progression of osteoarthritis (20%), unexplained pain (11%), instability (6%), infection (5%), and polyethylene wear (4%).</span><span>25</span><span> T</span><span>he majority of early failures (<5 years) were from aseptic loosening (25%)</span><span>, osteoarthritis progression (20%), and bearing dislocation (17%), whereas midterm and later revisions were performed primarily for osteoarthritis progression (38 to 40%), aseptic loosening (29%), and polyethylene wear (10%).</span><span>25</span></b>”
“<b><div>3-year-old male, rhizomelic, bilateral genu varum and varus ankles with frontal bossing and midface hypoplasia. Both parents of normal stature, want to know more about the etiology?</div><ol><li><div><span>COL2A1 deficiency</span></div></li><li><div><span>FGFR3 defciency</span></div></li><li><div><span>Cartilage oligomeric matrix protein deficiency</span></div></li><li><div><span>Diastrophic dysplasia sulfate transporter deficiency</span></div></li></ol></b>”
“2. FGFR3<br></br><br></br><div style=""><span>Mutations in the </span><a><span>FGFR3</span></a><span> </span><span><b><u>gene</u></b></span><span> cause </span><span>achondroplasia</span><span>. The </span><span>FGFR3</span><span> gene provide instructions for making a protein that is involved in the development and maintenance of bone and brain tissue. Two specific mutations in the </span><span>FGFR3</span><span> gene are responsible for almost all cases of achondroplasia. 80</span><span><b>PERCENT are sporatic. <br></br><br></br>Affects proliferative zone.</b></span><span><br></br><br></br></span></div><div style=""><span>Achondroplasia</span><span> is characterized by small stature with rhizomelia <br></br><br></br>- Foramen magnum stenosis - need MRI when young so they don’t die. Central sleep apnea, drooling etc<br></br>- Thoracolumbar kyphosis - gets better as starts to walk. Non op<br></br>- genu varum - no evidence has higher risk of arthritis, but we still operate on them.<br></br>- lumbar stenosis - short pedicles, get closer together as move down spine - stenosis in later years<br></br>- trident configuration of the hands<br></br>- recurrent ear infections<br></br><br></br><br></br></span></div><br></br>”
<div><b>Worst risk factor for periprosthetic joint infection?<br></br><br></br></b></div>
<div>a. HIV</div>
<div>b. Obesity</div>
<div>c. Autoimmune disease</div>
<div>d. Dementia (McGill/UofC/A/Mac)</div>
“Who knows, recent JAAOS has only a strong recommendation for obesity, less strong for others such as inflammation<br></br><br></br><div><span>JAAOS. 2020. Diagnosis and Prevention of Periprosthetic Joint Infections</span></div> <div>(1) Moderate strength evidence supports that obesity is associated with increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI).</div> <div><br></br>Much has been written, but few studies provide the quality of evidence to draw firm conclusions with possibly the exception of obesity which moderate quality evidence does suggest increases PJI risk in hip and knee arthroplasty.</div><br></br>However, RA is the strongest in this study.<br></br><img></img><br></br><br></br><br></br>”
“<b><div><span>Which of the following is TRUE regarding the treatment of trigger digits:<br></br><br></br></span><span>Percutaneous release of the trigger thumb</span><span>should be avoided</span><span><br></br></span></div><div><span>Complication rate of 20% after surgery<br></br></span><span>Pathology is at proximal edge of A2 pulley</span><span><i><br></br></i></span><span>Primary trigger digit and RA have similar prognosis</span></div></b><br></br>”
“<span><span>Percutaneous release of the trigger thumb</span><span>should be avoided<br></br><br></br></span><b><div style=""><span>Green’s Chapter 56 Tendinopathy<br></br><br></br></span></div><div style=""><span>A = TRUE<br></br></span><span></span><span>Percutaneous Trigger Finger Release.</span><span>Do not use for thumb or index finger due to proximity of crossing nerves</span></div><div style=""><span><br></br></span></div><div style=""><span>B = FALSE</span></div><div style=""><span>■</span><span> </span><span>Reported rates of complication following open trigger release range widely from 3 to 31%, depending in large part on the definition of “complication” and the severity of the adverse events noted.</span></div><div style=""><span>■</span><span> </span><span>This is the one I am least confident on, but I think A is defs true and C and D are defs false so this probably false too<br></br><br></br></span></div><div style=""><span>C = FALSE</span></div><div style=""><span>■</span><span> </span><span>Proximal phalangeal flexion, particularly with power grip, causes high angular loads at the distal edge of the first annular (A1) pulley<br></br><br></br></span></div><div style=""><span>D = FALSE</span></div><div style=""><span>Secondary trigger finger can be seen in patients with diabetes, gout, renal disease, RA, and other rheumatic diseases and is associated with a worse prognosis after conservative or surgical management<br></br><br></br></span><div> <div> <div><img></img><br></br><br></br><div>Always look for carpel tunnel (60% on EMGs)</div></div> </div></div></div></b><br></br></span>”
“<b><div>Which is the best intra-operative correction for a total knee replacement with a loose flexion gap and stable extension gap?<br></br><br></br></div><div><span>A. Upsize the femoral component</span></div><div><span>B. Re-cut tibia with increased slope</span></div><div><span>C. Increase tibial poly size and release posterior capsule</span></div><div><span>D. Increase tibial poly size and resect more distal fem</span></div></b><br></br>”
“Upsize the femoral component<br></br><br></br><div>Flexion Instability After Total Knee Arthroplasty JAAOS 2019<br></br>Step 1. Recut tibia with LESS slope if feel slope off<br></br>Step 2. Upsize femur<br></br><br></br>Using a bigger poly to make up for a flexion gap is BAD. This overstuffs the extension gap, and has lead to a flexion contracture in studies.<br></br><br></br><img></img><br></br></div>”
“<b><div><span>46yo patient with a distal radius fracture underwent distal radius ORIF and carpal tunnel release 8 months ago. Recovered well, but starting 6 months post-operatively had recurrence of paresthesias in the thumb, index and middle fingers. APB and opponens pollicis motor function are normal. No other sites of nerve compression are identified. What is the most appropriate management?<br></br><br></br></span></div><div><span>A. Neuroma excision and reconstruction of the injured palmar cutaneous nerve</span></div><div><span>B. Neurorrhaphy and nerve reconstruction</span></div><div><span>C. Revision neuroplasty and hypothenar fat flap</span></div><div><span>D. Reconstruction of the transverse carpal ligament</span></div></b><br></br>”
“<b><div><span>C. Revision neuroplasty and hypothenar fat flap</span><span><br></br><br></br><img></img></span></div><div><span>JAAOS 2019 <br></br><br></br>Note, new JAAOS on revision ulnar nerve that may come up. Same thing, revise with some sort of flap, often vein to prevent adhesions. Broken down into 1. Never got better. 2. Got better, but then came back. 3. Different symptoms</span></div></b><br></br>”
“<b><div>5yo girl presents with toe-walking. Which is a feature that would be MOST concerning?<br></br><br></br></div><div><span>A. Unilateral</span></div><div><span>B. Has been present for 3 years</span></div><div><span>C. Has not improved over time</span></div><div><span>D. Decreased passive ankle dorsiflexion</span></div></b><br></br>”
“A. Unilateral<br></br><br></br>JAAOS 2012<br></br><br></br>ITW is best described as bilateral persistent toe walking with or without a fixed equinus contracture without other discernible etiologic abnormalities in patients aged greater than 2<br></br><br></br>Toe walking before 2 is considered normal, and a normal progression of gait<br></br>Beware 5 year old who has recently begun to toe walk, especially unilatera<br></br><br></br>Idiopathic toe walking is a term used to define a gait in which a person walks with a toe‐toe gait pattern without any known correlated etiology<br></br><br></br>It is very important to make this a dx of exclusion as this can be due C<span>P, Duchannes, tethered cord, diastematomyelia, Autism, schizophrenia, global developmetal delay, CMT, spina bifida etc<br></br><br></br>Work up to consider<br></br></span><ol> <li>Spine xray/MRI depending on history and physical</li> <li>Gait analysis</li> <li>EMG - may or may not be helpful</li> <li>CK—> may lead to muscle bx if >5000</li></ol><b><u>Remember, RCT shows botox has no impact</u></b><br></br><br></br><div><div>Randomized Controlled Trial</div><div><div>J Bone Joint Surg Am<span>.</span>2013 Mar 6;95(5):400-7.</div></div><span>doi: 10.2106/JBJS.L.00889.</span></div><h1>Botulinum toxin A does not improve the results of cast treatment for idiopathic toe-walking: a randomized controlled trial</h1>”
“<b><div>What is true about pseudosubluxation of the cervical spine in pediatric patients? (REPEAT)<br></br><br></br></div><div><span>1. Posterior body will have some subluxation</span></div><div><span>2. Subluxation most common at C3/4</span></div><div><span>3. It is due to vertical facet orientation</span></div><div><span>4. To differentiate from pathologic pseudosubluxation, a line can be drawn between the</span></div><div><span>spinous processes</span></div></b><br></br>”
“<b><div><span>2. False, most common at c2/3</span></div><div><span>3. False, due to horizontal facts</span></div><span>4. False,can draw swischuk line from c1 - c2 posterior arch</span><span><br></br><br></br></span></b><img></img><br></br><b><span><br></br></span></b><b><span>Careful reading of wording. If it says spinous process for swischuk’s line = FALSE. If it says spinolaminar or posterior arch, may be TRUE.<br></br></span></b>”
“<b><div>Contracture seen with vascularized fibula harvest:</div><ol><li><div><span>FHL</span></div></li><li><div><span>Achilles</span></div></li><li><div><span>Tib post</span></div></li><li><div><span>Tib ant</span></div></li></ol></b>”
“Repeat<br></br><br></br>FHL<br></br><br></br><img></img>”
“<b><div><span>56M diabetic, comes in with complaint of thumb weakness (low median nerve), dropping objects, etc. On exam noted D4/5 MCP hyperextension and PIP flexion (high median neve). Most appropriate tendon transfer?</span></div><ol><li><div><span>FDS to Adductor Pollicis</span></div></li><li><div><span>FPL to APL</span></div></li><li><div><span>Something to EDM</span></div></li><li><div><span>FCU to radial lateral bands of 4/5</span></div></li></ol></b>”
“<b><div><span>Think it is describing low ulnar palsy with a positive froments sign. Therefore, tendon transfers</span></div><br></br><div><span>■</span><span> </span><span>FDS of long finger to adductor pollicis</span></div><br></br><div><span><img></img></span></div></b><br></br>”
“<b><div><span></span><span>25yo sustains galeazzi fracture, after anatomic reduction of distal radius, the druj is reducible but unstable and distal ulna dislocates dorsal. Very distal small tip of ulna is fractured. What is appropriate treatment? (repeat)<br></br><br></br></span></div><div><span>a) Pin radius to ulna in pronation for 6 weeks</span></div><div><span>b) repair TFCC (arthroscopically or open) then early motion at 1-2 weeks</span></div><div><span>c) fix styloid fracture with tension band construct and early motion at 1-2 weeks</span></div><div><span>d) cast in above elbow in supination for 6 weeks</span></div></b><br></br>”
“Repeat, nobody can agree on the answer. Likely B, but nobody is happy with the early ROM<br></br><br></br><b><div><span>●</span><span> </span><span>Orthobullets (via Giannoulis, 2007)<br></br><br></br></span></div><div><span>○</span><span> </span><span>A</span><span>lgorithm</span></div><div><span>■</span><span> </span><span>Stable DRUJ</span></div><div><span>●</span><span> </span><span>Cast in supination for 6 weeks<br></br><br></br></span></div><div><span>■</span><span> </span><span>Unstable DRUJ</span></div><div><span>●</span><span> </span><span>TFCC repair and DRUJ pinning with K-Wire in neutral rotation<br></br><br></br></span></div><div><span>■</span><span> </span><span>Unstable DRUJ with Ulnar Styloid Fracture</span></div><div><span>●</span><span> </span><span>ORIF of ulnar styloid with tension band wire or lag screw<br></br><br></br></span></div><div><span>■</span><span> </span><span>Irreducible DRUJ – likely due to tendon interposition (ECU, EDC or EDM)</span></div><span>●</span><span> </span><span>Open reduction and TFCC Repair<br></br></span></b><br></br>Chan / Badre say more people are moving away from pinning and if you are 100p the distal radus is ATF, open and fix the TFCC.<br></br>”
“<b><div>What is the MOST common reason for revision in a 3 component total ankle replacement, 10 years post replacement: (repeat)<br></br><br></br></div><div><span>A) sub clinical Infection</span></div><div><span>b) Poly wear and osteolysis</span></div><div><span>c) Medial malleolus stress fracture</span></div><div><span>d) Subtalar arthritis</span></div></b><br></br>”
b) Poly wear and osteolysis