hard-engineering
this involves building structures along the coast
groynes
timber or rock structures built at right angles to the coast
they trap sediment being moved along the coast by longshore drift and build up the beach
PROS of groynes
the built-up beach increases tourist potential and protects the land behind it
relatively inexpensive - £5,000 to £10,000 each (at 200-metre intervals)
CONS of groynes
-groynes starve beaches further along the coast of fresh sediment because they interrupt longshore drift –> increased erosion elsewhere
unnatural and rock groynes are unattractive
example of groynes
MAPPLETON
two rock groynes were built in 1991
at Cowden (3km south of Mappleton), the resultant sediment starvation caused erosion of the cliffs to increase from 2.5m a year to 3.8 between 1991 and 2007)
seawall
made of stone or concrete at the foot of a cliff or at the top of a beach
usually, have a curved face to reflect waves back into the sea
PROS of a seawall
often have a long promenade for people to walk on
effective prevention of erosion
CONS of a seawall
they reflect wave energy rather than absorbing it
they can be intrusive and unnatural looking
(the most expensive coastal defence) - build & maintain (£6,000 a metre)
rock armour
large rocks placed at the foot of a cliff or at the top of a beach
forms a permeable barrier to the sea, breaking up the waves
PROS of rock armour
CONS of rock armour
can be very intrusive
rocks can be dangerous
example of a seawall
WITHERNSEA
a straight sea wall was built was 1875 but over time, wave energy scoured the base of the wall, causing it to collapse
offshore breakwater
a partly submerged rock barrier designed to break up the waves before they reach the coast
PROS of offshore breakwater
an effective permeable barrier
CONS of offshore breakwater
visually unappealing
costly, between £1 million and £2 million